It's disrespectful to boxing to have lomachenko ranked higher than P4P #8. TRUE P4P LIST INSIDE!

How high did you have Kov on your P4P list before Ward beat him?

 

Your not even taking into account that the ams and pros are different, and like its been stated before me on this thread by someone, hes done what hes done whilst learning...

 

So to make it clear, you don't think a fighter regardless of age needs time to adjust to the pro's ??

 

I'm a huge fan of Errol Spence but he's not even close to #3 p4p yet.

 

In your opinion, which is a poor one.

 

Gary Russell, Sosa, Martinez, Axe Man?

Wtf you talkin about?

 

He beat someone who was borderline P4P (would've been considered 10th at least if people knew how good titleholder Sosa and Marriaga actually were) in Walters - a fearsome opponent.
Also, Gary Russell Jr looks like an elite fighter.
He also achieved boxing history three times:
1. World title in third pro fight - equalled record
2. Record for being a 2 weight world champion in just 7 fights
3. 10 pro fights, 9 world title fights.
Crawford himself has beaten nobody if we're going there being hypercritical, yet he's towards the top of virtually every list now.
The loss has been unavenged because Salido has ran away - it was actually going to happen but Salido pulled out with a sore pinky, so you have to be a complete 'homer' to not give Loma his props for trying to make the fight.
No.1? No. That's Andre Ward. Number 2? I think Loma has an argument, I give it to Crawford though definitely.

 

Loma/Rigo my personal P4P#1 fighters

Loma has so many no mas endings they will have to add a new category Win , loss, draw, disqualified, No Mas

Rigo is begging fighters from his division to fight and not one wants the action. Professional prize fighters with mouths to feed dont want the opportunity to beat the champ.

Now all the people in your list can get a fight. my guys are so good, fighters are saying why bother its just another L for me and no mas worst case.

 

That's why I mentioned two factors:
1. He was adjusting to the pros. When you're adjusting to the pros, age does not matter. Lomachenko had specialised his style accordingly to what was optimal for the amateurs, and that isn't actually what is optimal for pros. He has only relatively recently showed signs of great adaptation with only residual adjustment issues.
2. Why is no one expecting it of Michael Conlan? Just imagine if he took on Leo Santa Cruz and beat him in his 4th pro fight? Well Lomachenko bettered that. Zhou Shiming was knocked out by someone in his 10th pro fight. Why weren't we expecting yet another GOAT level amateur to do as well? Oh yeah...point 1 is the reaosn.

Moreover, Muangsurin has the record - he actually came from being a legendary Muay Thai Boxer, aged 24 by the time he turned pro.

 

Lomo knocking out Garcia what are you smoking why do you think the Garcias's brother are desperately pursuing this fight and Bob is ignoring them you could criticize Bob but is not stupid nobody knows Mickey better than him.