Its easy to have a lotta ko's when you're fighting a buncha corpses

The same N'dam who turned down the fight when he was the WBA interim champ? Obviously you don't need to play dumb as you already are a mentally f****ed up imbecile.

 

N'dam was supposed to turn up for a Purse bid against Golovkin but He vacated His Title rather than Fighting GGG...You may think he had a Chance against Golovkin....but N'Dam himself believed he had no chance...He gave up His Title rather than Fighting him.!!!!

 

Isn't Ward Caucasian?

 

N'dam was waiting for the IBF title shot since he beat Curtis Stevens you ****ing imbecile, way before GGG-Monroe was signed. The only time it could be made was when both held a piece of WBA trinket and N'dam didn't want it back then. Anyone with half a brain cell can see this, which obviously doesn't apply to you.

 

The hate comes from beating bum after bum after bum.

 

Cereal, you're a moron and are in denial.

 

***** slapped

 

:deal

:good Educate these fools Mr CST.

 

I don't hate Golovkin. But I get incredibly sick of the hype around - especially the hype coming from HBO.

The middleweight division is, by and large, TERRIBLE. Just awful.

You go back to guys who aren't even considered great middleweight champs of the past, like Michael Nunn.

Nunn fought the undefeated Olympic Gold Medalist and reigning IBF champ Frank Tate for the belt. Stopped him. He unified against Sumbu Kalambay, scoring a one round knockout. He fought Iran Barkley (former champ who would go up and win super middleweight and light heavyweight titles). He fought top middleweight contender Juan Roldan, as well as Donald Curry and Marlon Starling - two of the top welterweights of era. And he lost his title to James Toney, an all-timer.

That was a fairly typical middleweight reign. A nice mix of big names. Nothing to go crazy over. Just a good reign featuring some top names at the time. And Michael Nunn IS NOT considered an all-time great middleweight.

Then you have Golovkin, who has a ridiculous number of defenses (like 16) ... and his list of opponents by comparison to guys like Nunn who aren't considered a great ... is just terrible.

I don't know if ANYONE Golovkin defended against could beat any single fighter Michael Nunn defended against, let alone Nunn himself.

It's not that anyone wants Golovkin to fight some great all-time middleweights. Just fight some top quality guys. They are out there. Make some deals.

Golovkin's title defenses resemble the defenses of someone like Sven Ottle more than some all-time great middleweight.

If Golovkin had never come to the U.S., and instead he just set up shop in Germany (like Felix Sturm did) ... and Golovkin fought all the same challengers he has faced so far ... I don't think anyone would be paying much attention to him.

They'd just consider him a title holder who prefers to milk the belts for a bunch of soft defenses. Like a Sven Ottke.

But, since he's on HBO, and HBO has very few fighters at the moment, they are just overhyping Golovkin to ridiculous proportions. (They're doing the same to Chocolito, who has fought basically NO ONE at all.)

Golovkin has talent. Clearly. But his opponents are just bad. And people knew that going in to every fight. To me, right now he's just another guy like a Sven Ottke or a Dariusz Michalczewski. (And they probably faced better competition than Golovkin has.)

If he doesn't fight somebody quick, he's going to be largely forgotten like Ottke and Dariusz are today ... even with HBO hyping the hell out of him.

 

yes. boxing fans are getting tired of ggg's bum of the month tour.
he needs to leave bumland.
canelo wont fight him unless ggg accepts 155.