It's funny how some people here have built up Cotto like he's this unbeatable fighter

Mayweather has weaknesses...all fighters do...you may not think so because you're the typical Floyd groupie. Floyd's biggest weaknest that he's a ***** and will always find a way out of fighting the best...besides corrales, he has cherry pick every opponent...most of them being the weakest of the best...not the best of the best. BTW...Cotto and Margo beat Floyd without ever landing a single punch...that means something.

 

thats not a weakness...
maybe a personality defect but not a weakness

when chalking up a game plan against floyd...
you wont see this on the dry erase board..

-use jab
-use foot move ment
- floyds a *****

be serious

but you want to hear my opinion of floyd vs cotto?

check out these two threads
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78019&page=4
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78065&page=6

 

No one beats Mayweather ever. I think god may lose by split decision.

 

^ you serious or playing around?


haha as much as ive been watching him today... i might agree to that statement

 

Put those Avatars on the line boys...

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=77316

 

haha **** betting... im good just watching

 

how about a prime tommy hearns

 

it aint happening so i aint talking about it...

comparing old fighters and new fighters bores me...
not trying to completely dead you or anything but i hate bringing up old fighters..

i think it stifles foward flowing thought & progression

 

I am dead serious. Maybe a late round KO but Mayweather will goe to hell if that happens.

 

pretty much how ive been feeling all day..

i was thinking maybe i was just over exagerating to myself... but floyds skill set really impressed me that much

i made a thread in a very objective fashion to look for reasons to prove myself wrong and not put floyd on too high on a pedistal but the only thing people came up with was effective pressure

people tried to explain the whole applied pressure thing to me but i still dont buy it..

people bring up the castillo fight
and floyd basically proved the whole "effective pressure" thing must be bull****... cause if castillo supposedly won the first 1... why didnt/couldnt he win the 2nd one?

especially if he supposedly figured out floyd by.. "effectively pressuring him"

 

Listen Floyd is talented but everyone is beatable. Every one has their flaws like real life. I thought Castillo won the first fight because he threw more landed more with the higher percentage. I think they should of had a third fight.

 

i mean i dont think its impossible to beat floyd because anything can happen...

but from what he has shown us so far.... hes very very incredible...
and maybe floyd has flaws but none that can be seen in any fight so far..

maybe castillo SHOULD have won the first fight but he didnt.. so floyd gave him his chance. if he won the first 1 theres no reason he hsoulndt have won the 2nd one.. but he didnt.. the whole castillo thing is really invalid to me..

its like a loophole when arguing against floyd

 

Sorry mayweather beats cotto everyday of the week and twice on sunday

 

Yeah but you know in your heart Castillo won the first fight and Mayweather should have not retired undefeated. Guess what I aint even a Castillo fan. By the way if you feel like crap get some soup and take a sleeping pill and try to sleep that **** off.

 

it dont matter.... we can argue back and fourth the effects of castillo & mayweather..

but on april 20th 2002 .. floyd walked out of that building a winner.. and 6 months later he did the same thing... end of story