It's Kell Brook that's overrated!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Capt, Dec 14, 2014.


  1. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    blah blah blah, khan glass jaw....blah blah
    no he doesnt noob, brook wouldnt win 2 rounds if it went 12..... :lol:
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Khan beats the breaks off Brook no doubt about it
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    brook is the mini david haye
    all talk , cherry picked opponents, over rated
     
  4. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Brook always moans about how easy Khan has had it, what a hypocrite considering the 30 odd tomato cans Hearn has fed him in his own backyard.
    I give Kell Porter but that is it, Brook needs 4 -5 title defences against legit top 10 welters before I buy into the hype. This version of Khan wins by wide UD, Brook's only chance is by K.O.
     
  5. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    FFS, Brook's opponent win loss record says it all

    @ June 2014

    W 639
    L 919
    D 62

    :lol:
     
  6. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    Good point. This guy is being greatly overhyped by his fans because of a split decision win against a fighter who himself was overrated.
     
  7. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    no way. khan would need to compete against alot vs brook.
     
  8. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    He would win an easy UD IMO. BTW bump:yep
     
  9. lolercakes

    lolercakes Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,164
    27
    Apr 16, 2011
    Very basic boxer with an average defense and flat feet. Not sure what the fuss is really?
     
  10. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    He has a great jab, but that's about it. He's a slow flat footed boxer who hasn't been tested against real competion. Fighting and beating an overhyped fighter in Shawn Porter is not enough to prove you have what it takes to be a big thing at one of the toughest divisions in boxing. I mean who exactly did Porter beat, a past his prime Paulie Malinnagi who at his best was a fringe contender. I'm not saying Khan shouldn't be willing to fight him, he should because there will be a lot of money involved and he can make himself an even bigger superstar amongst British boxing fans. But if Brook wants to prove himself as legite threat at WW why not challenge the winner/loser of Mayweather-Pacquiao, Thurman, Bradley, Maidana,and Marquez instead of only focusing on Khan.
     
  11. lolercakes

    lolercakes Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,164
    27
    Apr 16, 2011
    He's ducking Thurman, initially chalenged him then backed out. He's even willing to come to the UK to fight him, Hearn is not having it.
     
  12. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    timing beats telegraphed speed
     
  13. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    Yup. I mean Brook should be happy, yet it's still about Khan.
     
  14. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    Brook is too slow though. I see Khan moving in and out, and coasting to a one sided UD victoy.
     
  15. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,129
    240,504
    Nov 23, 2013
    I think I must of been drunk when I posted on this thread because what I said makes very little sense.:conf:lol:

    Very poorly written for me. I'm usually fairly coherent.