It's not a robbery if it was a close fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Meow, Dec 23, 2012.


  1. Ding

    Ding Champ Full Member

    972
    0
    May 2, 2006

    :deal
     
  2. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    788
    1
    Aug 16, 2012
    Real talk.

    Ppl act like every 7-5 decision can be flipped and it'd be ok, just cuz it was 7-5. I hate this 'close fights can't be robberies' bull****.
     
  3. PartALLthaTImE

    PartALLthaTImE Active Member Full Member

    553
    38
    Mar 20, 2010
    half the people commenting on it, probably haven't even seen the fight
     
  4. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    Morales vs Pacquaio 1 was a 7 - 5 decision by all three judges ( I feel it was a fair score. ) yet it was a clear win for Morales.
     
  5. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    It's not a close fight if 80% of fans (as evidenced by the "who won?" poll the last time I checked it) thought it was a robbery.
     
  6. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    This man knows about **** decisions.
     
  7. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    90
    Dec 12, 2012
    freddie roach had the fight even.

    i had the fight very very close as well, cud have gone either way.

    agree with the thread starter
     
  8. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    Freddie Roach did not score the fight. When asked how he had it going into the 12th round, he hesitated and said "the winner of this round wins the fight." He's scrambled and pulled this same response out of his ass before.
     
  9. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    I could have seen a draw but it's really hard to see Adamek winning this one , probably that people who scored it in favor of Adamek had been blinded by Thomas 10 seconds furry at the end of each rounds.

    Bad judging yes but no robbery
     
  10. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    Duva fight... I don't think we can really assume they were merely bad at judging.
     
  11. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    yes, 72 people is statistically significant. The poll is valid and reliable. LOL
     
  12. Meow

    Meow Guest

    Except the fact is that a 7-5 decision can be flipped if all the rounds aren't agreed about by the judges. The rounds were close, a robbery occurs when the rounds aren't close and the other guy somehow wins them.
     
  13. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    ESB forum polls conform to the most rigorous scientific polling standards in all of the free world. The numbers don't lie: this was a robbery.
     
  14. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,436
    141
    Feb 27, 2008
    Roach had it by one round and Flores who was cheerleading USS all night had him by only 2 rounds.

    That is not a robbery when there were so many close rounds. Steve would come out with a strong jab at the start of the round and then fade and allow Adamek to press him on the ropes I also thought that that while USS won a lot of the first few rounds he also lost a lot of the late rounds.

    I had it USS by 1-2 rounds, but the crying isn't at all warranted.
     
  15. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Use whatever criteria you want.... Adamek didn't win. There is no way in the world you can have Adamek winning that fight and some people went as far as giving Cunningham 11 rounds.

    ROBBERY!!!!