khan would use his jab a lot in that fight to try to keep pac at a length so he cant land that right hook. i imagine it would be a dominant fight after he starts slipping that jab and landing counter uppercut and right hook. they might cancel each other out early on though so i imagine it would last at least 6 rounds.
I don't know why anybody would say it is misleading... It is implied on Roach statement that Pac is definitely better than Khan. Sometimes, I wish reading comprehension is a mandatory test when joining any forums.
you know its true when their's two articles on the whole web about this. someone has just quoted him from 2 years ago and written a new story. great journalism! by the way your proving what jealous losers some american boxing fans are, as soon as something bad about amir is written you post it on here. your desperate!
pac would win but khan would give a better fight than cotto, marrgerrito, mosley, hatton and clotty. khan has the height, reach and slight speed advantage. he could keep him behind the jab, staying on his toies early. it would still be competative in a real fight imo. don't act like pacs god like and khan isn't elite level. khan is clearly very difficult to fight. if i had to predict, i would say pac by late tko.
Erm, maybe because this... ...reflects nothing of what Roach actually said? Not that it matters, of course. Because it's a given fact that Manny toys with all of his sparring partners, including Khan.