It's Pacquiao Vs Marquez! Official!!!

You keep trying to drag it away. Did I mention Diaz? I'm reffering to the whole bunch of press releases not specifically Diaz.

Here's my original post:

You were saying it's flawed? What's the flaw in there?

That's my opinion and it doesn't have to have evidence. That's common sense based on what had happen.

Like I said . . . give it up. :deal

 

Your own post ruins your "I wasn't talking about Diaz" BS.

You refer to JMM's press release and say that it's not important because he can agree all he wants, but GBP gets the final negotiation. You then say that Pacquiao's team did was make it appear that he was going to fight the 135lbs or other fighters. The only fighter Pacquiao has been talking about fighting other than JMM has been Diaz at 135. He hasn't mentioned another fighter besides those two since Guzman's fight. So you were obviously referring to David Diaz as being "the ploy" that made GBP agree.

 

I said that I didn't see the ploy. I specifically referred to the David Diaz signing as I pointed out to you and quoted your response. If you carried on a debate talking about something entirely different

That IS your position is it not? That you weren't talking about that?

 

Roy Jones jr vs James Toney? That was #1 and #2 facing off.

 

I was talking of a ploy which started long way back when even Katsidis and Valero was being considered. That tactic screwed up GBP's negotiating chips and continued until the last moment when Diaz and JMM were the only ones remaining on that list. My post on that "ploy" dates back about two months ago . . . in case you don't know.

Now on GBP, isn't that what happened? JMM already agreed but Arum and Pac didn't say anything until GBP and TOP RANK made the final talk? :hey

Don't mess this up . . . go back to the real issue.

What's flawed in my original post? You can't see the ploy? . . . that's your problem . . . but trying to drag it away from the issue won't prove your cause.

 

LOL...like I said, you keep talking about stuff you said months ago, but I clearly made my argument and clearly indicated I was referring to the Diaz signing. You responded once I made that clear. If you carried on a debate talking about something you said months ago, that's on you. Your post was not in that context. It doesn't say "I have been saying this for months".

 

#2 and #3. Whitaker was still #1.

But still big. So was DLH vs Trinidad. That was BIGGER than this fight.

 

Well you're out of line. You're the one out of context . . . you questioned my post and my opinon and drag the arguement into somewhere else . . . now you're saying I'm out of context?

Goddam boii . . . thanks for the laugh.

:rofl

 

This thread has Officially turned into several pages of argumentative garbage!

 

Well what can we do . . . somebody shows up and question soimebody's opinion says it's flawed and ask for proof.

:rofl :rofl :rofl

 

Yeah but for the 97% who haven't been involved in or following this conversation, it's pretty dauntingly long.

Any highlights? :think

 

Surely you jest "boii" (are you five?)? I clearly made the distinction in what I was talking about. Your continuing the discussion after knowing it clearly indicates you knew the topic. But since you can't win that argument, you are falling back on your ambiguity. It was a nice try, but rather transparent.

If you were in fact referring to your own posts for the past few months, perhaps you should try a little harder to be an informative poster and actually SAY THAT. Otherwise, the regular humans who like to read in context and in linear time, will continue to be confused by your lack of information and arrogance that people actually read only your posts and would therefore "guess" that you are referring to other posts you have made not in this particular context.

 

daddy's sald?

What does it has to do with your lies?

Explain that boii . . . what's up with the $1.3 Mil story?

:hi:

 

Psychopath and kg, make your own thread and debate all you want there. I'm not reading your posts but it takes time to look for the post of others. You two hugged the whole thread trying to find out who is out of line!

 

Fair enough.