Nah nah nah :nono boii . . . next time when you question somebody's opinion . . . make sure you understand what it's all about and you don't ask for proof. :rofl
If u just know how to read and understand then you'll see who's getting owned. Just like your ass being owned everyday . . . now explain your fabricated lies . . . my ***** :yep :hi:
Nah your just hallucinating and hoping for it . . . my *****. You still have to explain your fabricated lies. :yep :hi:
On that part yes I was talking about Diaz . . . but the ploy didn't just start there. This content is protected What's wrong with your brain? Is it hard to understand that? :-(
Homo? Nah nah nah :nono . . . your bitchslaping comtnue boii . . . while I'm debating with other poters. Still got to explain your lies about the $1.3 Mil :yep :hi:
i don't know why you peeps are still arguing. the fight that we all wanted to see has finally been made. you may have your favorites between pac and jmm. but the point is that all boxing fans no matter who they side with will see a great, great fight between the #2 and #3 p4p fighters in the world. these type of fights don't happen that much in boxing. that's why true fans should look at this fight in the context of its over-all benefit to uplifting the sport rather than wholly dwelling in just their petty boxer loyalties. in fights like this, everybody wins. even the boxer who loses still brings home millions after this fight. and no, the loser of this fight doesn't end his career either. there is definitely no shame in losing to either the #2 and #3 fighter in the world. at the most elite level of this sport, anything can happen and anybody can win at any given moment.
Motivated? Bashing a loser ass like you? Nah . . . you're not a motivation . . my ***** . . . you're just a past time. :yep Now explain your lies. :hi: '
Except you're lying. When Diaz is first brought up as a viable opponent, you cheer it on and even defend it in other threads. You never mention it as being a ploy. You only mention later on that the press releases about the NEGOTIATIONS might be a ploy. You make no mention of Diaz and neither does the poster you quote. So if you were talking about Diaz during our debate, it's only logical that you were talking about the same situation I was. Othewise, why in all the other Diaz vs Pac threads prior to 11-21 do you cheer and defend the decision as a stepping stone to Juan Diaz instead of saying it's a ploy to get JMM in the ring? BTW, Roach never refuted that press release. All he said was "Who would watch that fight?" and expressed concern over Diaz's size.
Yeah right . . . explain your fabricated lies . . . I'm not trying to be funny . . . I'm just humilating your arrogant ass . . . my *****. Now explain the $1.3 Mil fabricated story. :yep :hi:
This has nothing to do with that. I don't care who wins this fight. I said I didn't see the ploy in faking a fight with Diaz and asked him what he was talking about. His answer made no logical sense.
Nah nah nah . . . you came in from nowhere and doesn't know what I have been saying. I have been praying for the JMM fight but I said in the other thread if Team Pac would decide to fight Juan Diaz I guess we can't blame them They are making plans. Questions came in so I have to answer with my opinion why it's not that bad. That doesn't mean I'm praising it. Still desperate man . . . I really pity you. :-(
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29934 http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29901&page=3 http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30129 Never once in any of these threads do you mention a "ploy". The first time you mention a ploy in reference to Diaz is in our debate in this thread. You defend the Diaz speculation in some of those threads. And in the thread where Diaz is announced as the next opponent, you type "Yes:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl". BTW, as I said earlier, Roach never refuted that Diaz signing. He simply said "Who would watch that?" and then expressed concern over Diaz's size.