Not in that thread . . .I'm justifying why it's not a bad fight if team pac decides to fight Diaz that's what it is. I'll find that article which say Roach said . . . there's definitely no decision yet. Damn . . . you're so desperate. :-(
Well then we have 2 competing articles AFTER the supposed Diaz fight was signed. Both times Roach was interviewed, and both times he was vague. The only thing he says is that their is no decision made. And even in this article it says: Sounds to me like the official announcment made yesterday, the one we are arguing in RIGHT NOW, isn't official either since this article is dated yesterday as well.
Well the point is that's the news I was referring to. "No decission yet" I guess that's clear enough for you. :yep
You're too quick to judge without knowing the whole story. I know what I'm talking about. Just because I didn't mnetion the word "ploy" in justifying why it's not abd fight for Pac doesn't mean the ploy theory is not true. :hey
That's clear enough to say nothing is signed. But I also don't think I ever read that the Diaz fight was signed, but just decided on, so I am unclear on that because guys like this use statements like these (lawyers basically) to say nothing and everything at the same time. Believe it or not, with all the misdirection going on, regardless of my arguing with you, I will not believe anything until a press conference is held and the fight is in ink.
That would make three of us....you know damn well you are just as bad as we are:deal Speaking of which. Where the hell is PacDBest?