It's Pacquiao Vs Marquez! Official!!!

Here we are days later and this still isn't official. Like I said, complete BS lie.

 

That won't be official until the docs got signed on December or January maybe.

But since a press con was already sched on Dec for the official announcement that's as good as a made fight. Baring any injuries from any of the fighters.

 

I like Marquez to win that one by TKO in the late rounds after outboxing and battering Pacquaio for about 9 rounds.

I like Pacman, but lets be honest, he's pretty one dimensional. Avoid his left hooks and he's very beatable for a skilled boxer like JM Marquez. He won't be making the same mistake he made in their first fight.

Seems like Pacman is only interested in fighting older guys these days...I recall the Juan Diaz challenge to fight a young Mexican champion but...there's gotta be a mountain more money fighting Marquez. I'd love to see Pacman take on younger brother Rafael Marquez! or Vasquez!

 

And who do you think you are dumb**** . . . you came back for your bitchslapping?

Yeah come and get it boii.

What's up with your $1.3 Mil fabricated story?

:hi:

 

JMM can't even KD a one-eyed Juarez.

Pac fighting Rafael or Vasquez? Pac might be accused of fighting way, way smaller guys who probably have an overrated power (they were basically throwing everything at each other but took them forever to ko each other). Besides there is nothing special about those fighters. They are not basically defensive gems. If you watch their fight (both fights), it was nothing but a slugfest (which would probably earn it a FOTY) but their was very little defense that we could be gloating about. NADA. Their offensive firepower is there but let us not talk about defense.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Daddy? :nono

Nah nah nah got to explain to this whole board about your fabricated $1.3 Mil story booii . . . stop talking about daddy's, mommy's and other bullshits.

That's not the right way to defend your name boii.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

Remember that? :rofl

:hi:

 

In every Pac fight, have you ever wondered how many times had he been outlanded. Let me give you an idea. In the Pac-Mab 2 fight, Mab landed 128 while Pac landed more than double that.

Just because Pac had problems dealing with JMM counterpunching that he was an easy target. Pac's defense is in his movement. His signature dart in and out style that could probably be countered if you have the skills of JMM or Guzman. Does he stand in front of the opponent stationary? Never. In the JMM-Pac 1 (where he was supposedly schooled) fight as well as the EM-Pac 1, the punch stats were actually almost the same.

Now, the Marquez and Vasquez are not basically what you call slicster. They stand in front of you and slug it out and hope that their power would have more impact than yours. Which is a very wrong style against Pac (that does not include the fact that they are even smaller than JMM and are fighting at 122).

 

Which seems to be your way of avoiding answering my question for a third time.

I wasn't looking for flaws in your argument either time. Your post was flawed, I need not look for it. (I wasn't the only one to find them).

It's simple really. You just like to speculate and make semi-educated guesses using the facts you need while disregarding the facts you don't. If it seems I am talking in circles, it's because you never made a consistant argument.

Was the Diaz signing a ploy or not? That was the debate. You have not shown anything here that would show that it was, or introduced any actual evidence. The timeline shows JMM was accepting of the terms prior to the Diaz press release. Simple as....

 

Have I mentioned any Diaz signing? What debate?

I mentioned over and over again in a lot of my posts that I feel that the press releases and bull**** talks are all just ploy by Team Pac to make the fight happen the way they want it.

You came into the picture and start twisting it around . . . what evidence do you need.

You're desperate that's what this is all about. Give it up boii.

 

wait, if this fight is at 135..I'm going with Marquez. 10 oz gloves just doesn't sound right with Pac.

 

Damn kid. What the hell do you think we have been talking about? I have mentioned it numerous times. Divac mentioned the exact same timeline and you acknowledged it. Now all of a sudden you weren't talking about the alleged Diaz signing, even though it has been clearly mentioned as my disagreement in numerous posts? So what was the point that you were trying to makeatsch

To which you responded:

So you knew we were discussing the Diaz fight as the "ploy". All this other crap you brought in isn't relevant. And if you couldn't tell that's what I was talking about, but responded to it anyways., lol...

 

What are we talking about?

This is what I have posted and where it started:

And this:

Now what are you talking about? :yep

Who's desperate?

 

Your response:

So you knew on that same page exactly what I was referring to. So you knew the subject. Don't play dumb now. Your post has to be taken in context. Directly preceeding this press release were the press releases that Pacquiao was fighting Diaz. Using the ambiguity of your post to feign that you weren't speaking in context of the situation is childish at best.