It's pretty sad that Clinton Woods is held in such high regard

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by janeschicken, Feb 5, 2008.


  1. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He also beat former Lineal champion Gonzalez 2 times.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    Why the hell do people here try to **** on professional boxers? :patsch
     
  3. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    And who is "of note"?

    He lost to RJJ at the mans peak. A fighter who was a phenomenon. He has since gone on to beat Johnson, Gonzalez and Hoye and is a current world champion who is next taking on Tarver.

    And yet you start a thread about him as if he is some hyped up fraud.:patsch What "high regard" are you talking about? When do you see "Woods is a beast" or "Woods is incredible" as thread titles on ANY boxing site?

    When have you seen the boxing press lavish praise on Woods? When has his win over Johnson and his wins over Gonzalez been made out to mean he is a huge talent who should be feared by all?

    Oh yeah...never.

    So what the **** are you babbling on about?

    He got whipped by an ATG who was at his peak and who was a stunning talent.
    He has gone on to be a world champ and act the total professional and is a recognised champ now who wants to fight the best in the division.
    The division is not much different than it was 6 years ago except that RJJ is not here now at his best.

    Dawson and others are quality fighters but no; not one of them is an RJJ....big surprise there eh?:roll:
     
  4. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    Exactly, and Gonzales is a hell of a lot better than he's given credit for.

    Woods is no Jones Jr that much is obvious but he's an honest guy and he always comes to fight. He's down to earth too and a genuinely nice person, which are 2 qualities that made Hatton an instant ATG in most Brits eyes. Difference is Woods has bollocks, Hatton doesn't.
     
  5. Snakefist

    Snakefist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,650
    3
    Feb 20, 2007
    No shame in losing to RJJ in a fight that took place back in 02, when Roy was still good, prime or very close to it.
     
  6. Snakefist

    Snakefist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,650
    3
    Feb 20, 2007
    On the record I hope Woods utterly destroys Tarver badly. He is just annoying to me.
     
  7. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    He has a great shot at it IMO.

    Tarvers lack of a consistent workrate will be his downfall in this fight(barring he doesnt KO Woods early).
     
  8. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    The key ingredients and logic of the thread have evidently gone way over your head, though others in here have grasped it. I'm saying that if Clinton Woods is the saviour of the Lightheavyweight division and does indeed unify the titles, it doesn't really say much for the quality of opposition at this time. Maybe I should re-phrase the title as "It's a shame we don't have anyone even close to Roy's talent in the division anymore"
     
  9. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    He's a different fighter from the RJJ fight. He's has very good punch output and his stamina is pristine
     
  10. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    Tarver is shot and Woods will dominate him. He has everything he needs to do the job: stamina, workrate, solid B level skills/abilities, mediocre power (but pretty good pop), and a solid enough chin. I wouldn't be surprised if Tarver gets stopped, he looked like complete **** in his last few performances.
     
  11. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    If he's not the equal of a prime RJJ, so what?
    Can't a division and its fighters be just as entertaining even if the quality is not quite the same?

    Like Richie Woodhall before him, Clinton Woods is a nice guy and a good hard-working solid pro.
    I'm happy for his success and hope that continues against Tarver.
     
  12. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    He is a vastly improved fighter since he fought Roy. Not to say he would ever come close to beating that version of Roy, but he should beat Tarver.
     
  13. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    For some reasons, I feel that Jones was on roid in that fight.
     
  14. UKFightFan

    UKFightFan Member Full Member

    262
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    This thread is pointless, you have made your mind up and will not accept anyone's point of view.

    Tarver is famous for beating beating an out of form RJJ 2 fights to 1 and winning and losing a fight to Johnson. He also got owned badly by Hopkins winning only 2 rounds on the scorecards.

    On the flip side, Woods has not beaten too higher level of opponent but to lose to RJJ before he started to slide is no shame. Since then he has come back and won the title so you have to respect him for this.

    Personally I think this will be an interesting fight. I've always thought that Tarver was overrated but on the flip side I've never been too impressed with Woods' workrate. I therefore expect a close fight and do not know who will win.
     
  15. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    :rofl Cant believe that Woods of all people has a hater!