Its unfortunate

I'll bet anyone here ten bucks that Hopkins comes out saying JC is ducking him.....

 

Did you see the first fight? It was ****in terrible. It was one of the most unwatchable fights I've seen.

You know what's funny about this thread though? You the thread starter are a Mayweather FANATIC, (different from a fan), yet you're going to criticize Calzaghe for who he didn't fight?

And considering the first fight was close to impossible to watch, are you even a boxing fan?

 

Calzaghe is the better fighter.

You obviously didn't see the fight if you think Hopkins is the better fighter

How about you apply your logic to PBF retiring in order to avoid a rematch with DLH?

 

Based on him whipping a one-dimensional robot

 

I'm not over anybody's nuts.

Point is, I don't go around making threads, "Oh no, Mayweather's retirement deprived us of DLH-Mayweather 2."

The key word is "hypocrite."

And that's what I'm tryin to say.

 

Well the "better fighter" suggestion is subjective, but in regards to it being something random, is question was completely legitimate.

If you're gonna defend Floyd, why aren't you defending Calzaghe?

I mean, really it's the same thing.

But hey, ya'll a different breed.

 

No.

Calzaghe is the better fighter.

He got knocked down in the first round, adapted to Hopkins style, outworked Hopkins and showed he has greater stamina than Hopkins, and won the fight, while Hopkins relied on spoiling tactics and faking lowblows to buy some rest time in the later rounds.

It was a decisive victory.

A rematch was not warranted.

You're a fanboy, nothing more.

 

At least RJJ showed a bit more ability than Pavlik...you ARE making me laugh

You think the fact that Hopkins took care of Pavlik so easily means he is 'newly invigorated' which apparently means if he fought Calzaghe again, he would actually TRY and win next time around

Do you understand how full of **** you are?

 

Who gives a ****?

We're talking boxing, not personality disorders here :nut