Its unfortunate

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by liljp361, Feb 5, 2009.


  1. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    Perhaps your confusing me with the other "fanboys" on this website who make excuses for Mayweather. im not one of them. dont confuse me with other people.

    And by "adapted" to Hopkins style. You mean landing right jabs and applying not very effective pressure with his legs and having his punches smothered??

    Cmon now even you admitted the first fight was horrible but yet you also say that Calzaghe did all this in the fight. Get off cal's nuts and realize what your saying here
     
  2. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    No, I'm not confusing you with anyoen else - I know who you are, a pathetic Mayweather fanboy. You already made an excuse in this thread for PBF "he is a deep individual" :lol:

    Hopkins wasn't able to put Calzaghe down again in the next 11 rounds was he?

    Hopkins threw all of 3 punches per round after that, and clinched endlessly once Calzaghe picked up the pace. The only time Hopkins showed any signs of life after round 1 was when he faked the low blow and got a rest break.

    There were very subtle adjustments and pressures applied by Calzaghe in that fight, but I wouldn't expect a fanboy like you to see them. All you can see is that Hopkins lost and because it was a split decision, you maintain it wasn't a decisive victory for Calzaghe.

    Well, a split decision is also known as a majority decision, which means it was decisive enough to award the win to Calzaghe.
     
  3. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    Showed more ability are you crazy? Hopkins had a tougher time with an undefeated Pavlik and Calzaghe had an easy fight with RJ. The old RJ when he was undefeated and had not only speed but concussive power and amazing legs like a trackstar would have beat Calzaghe. Yes I realize thats an opinion but cmon This version of RJ that Calzaghe fought was only fast hands and NO LEGS.. the point im getting at is he is not close to the once great fighter he was and you cant deny this dont try and make calzaghes victory over Calzaghe mean something and then Put down Hopkins victory over Pavlik. You dont make sense with that.

    Me full of ****? Yeah ok your just a blind Calzaghe fan who cant see beyond what hes saying
     
  4. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    Boxing doesnt hide your personality it reveals it. Get over yourself and give Hopkins credit you *****
     
  5. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol:

    Right...did the zombie-like Pavlik KD Hopkins in their fight?

    Did he land anything of any consequence on Hopkins? Any brutal uppercuts, etc?

    Nope...
     
  6. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    So that's what this thread's all about?

    Giving Hopkins credit?

    What the **** for?

    His performance vs Calzaghe?

    Do you give him credit for that?

    sheesh
     
  7. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    Look at yourself defending and making excuses for Calzaghe as well you hyprocrite.

    By the way this was never meant to be a Calzaghe bashing thread but you had to chime in with your ***** opinion and turn it into a mayweather bashing / calzaghes great thread. Hopkins will be remembered as an ATG great fighter and Calzaghe will not.
     
  8. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    Yeah it was a good knockdown but cmon he landed maybe 1 or 2 more significant punches in the whole damn fight.. didnt apply any pressure to make Calzaghe worry.. he was a sitting duck

    Watch the fight again and you will see Pavlik does land some rights and some punches in close. He applied his pressure and it wasnt easy for Hopkins. Calzaghe had an easier time with Jones than Hopkins with Pavlik.
     
  9. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    What for? hello arent you a boxing fan? Im not going to get into that if you want to be ignorant and not give Hopkins credit thats your decision lol
     
  10. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Get to **** child :deal

    You started this thread to imply that Calzaghe ducked a rematch with Hopkins by retiring.

    I'm not defending or making excuses for anybody, but they will BOTH be ATGs, you ****ing idiot. You think your petulant little opinion means **** in regards to that? :lol:
     
  11. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol::lol::lol:

    Hopkins had zero trouble with Pavlik.

    Calzaghe was KD'd by Jones.

    It's as simple as that, regardless of how you try to dress it up.
     
  12. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    I did not imply anything I just said how it was unfortunate since I think it would have been a good fight and much better than the first and it was something that me and im sure many other fans would have wanted to see. I didnt imply anything.

    And yes they will both be ATG except Hopkins will be a few places higher ;). And yeah my opinion matters otherwise you wouldnt be argueing it :yep
     
  13. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    So are you saying you stared this thread to give Hopkins credit for his accomplishments?

    If so, why do it under the guise or lamenting that we won't see a Calzaghe Hopkins rematch then?

    You don't have an agenda, do you? :lol:
     
  14. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    zero trouble? you think its easy for a 44 yr old man to fight at that kind of pace. I doubt even Hopkins knew he had that kind of fight left in him. It was only made to appear easy by Hopkins thanks to all the dedicated training he did and his skills. Everyone was questioning Hopkins stamina going into that fight and thinking he would fold in the second half of the fight but he didnt. He exceeded everyones opinions. and now thats hes beaten Pavlik its fans the dumb ones like you that say Oh well Pavlik was 1 dimensional or he wasnt that good etc. Stop being so blind you ignorant *****.
     
  15. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    No, you want to see a rematch because, like Hopkins and many of his fans, you are a sore loser and you think Hopkins can win it based on his performance vs Pavlik and because he said in the post fight interview "I'm going for the knock out now" (even though he didn't KO Pavlik) :lol:

    Your opinion means sweet **** all in regards to whether or not Calzaghe will be named as an ATG :deal