J.Calzaghe+ K.Pavlik+ S.Collins = Hypocrisy

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Taylex, Jun 14, 2008.


  1. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    Agreed! The should JC fight Pavlik debate is getting boring. I would be happy to see the JC Vs RJJ fight just out of curiousity!
     
  2. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    get a life.
     
  3. MellowChimp

    MellowChimp Member Full Member

    146
    0
    Apr 18, 2008
    Im sure lots of us are hypocrites of what we believed a decade earlier. And lots of people cite hypcocrisy till they themselves are in the position they once criticised.

    We all know Joe is past his best - im guessing he is aware of that too and this has to be a factor in his decisions.
     
  4. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Calling Kessler a young pretender is an insult to Joe and Kessler.
     
  5. cableguy

    cableguy Active Member Full Member

    725
    112
    Jul 19, 2004
    Maybe Pavlik and Froch should get it on. Maybe on the Calzaghe v Jones undercard....then winners meet
     
  6. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    I agree. I was gonna make a thread very similar to this one. As someone has already pointed out, if Calzaghe doesn't fancy facing Pavlik he is just using his head. But what reflects badly on him is downplaying Pavlik whilst hyping RJJ.
     
  7. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    He is past his best I agree with you on that. i realised this after the Bika fight and I think he only got through the Kessler fight because there was something wrong with his hand and he just let the fight slip away.
     
  8. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    ?