Jack Dempsey and the loaded gloves, what are your thoughts on it?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by AliMyths&Legends, May 21, 2017.


  1. AliMyths&Legends

    AliMyths&Legends Active Member banned Full Member

    544
    253
    Jan 4, 2017
    I have finally got round to reading Jack Dempsey's autobiography yesterday and I am very far though it. I found I have a first edition hardback which is great.

    Anyway love the book, very well written. Jack had a very hard life and pretty much fought just to eat(a lot of the time not nearly enough), and proved shelter for himself, having to work in mines as well as fight just to survive.

    From what I have read, and looked through, Jack never before, or after did the damage he inflicted on Willard to any other oppoent. I think it is highly likely Jack knowingly, or unknowingly had loaded gloves on during the Willard fight.

    I also noticed he had a lot of first round KO's after teaming up with Doc. It could be like Jack said Doc, that he was hungry, not training properly, and having no decent sparring before Doc, and that is why he suddenly preformed much better, but it could also be that Doc loaded Jack's gloves after they got together and that is why he suddenly had such an increase in his performance.

    I just really wanted to hear people's opinions about this, on both sides.
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    It's hard to say, there are a lot of factors to consider. One was that the two of them were at the opposite ends of the fitness and fighting shape spectrum. Jack was a full time fighter, an athlete in his absolute physical and career prime. Willard by then hardly a part time boxer at best. He had won the title from an old man years ago. If Willard had not have held a title and he was simply a comeback contender he still would be a bad choice of an opponent for jack Dempsey. Just the shock of ring action could very well have been enough. Remember Tyson v Holmes? Larry was about the same condition. Yet later when he took a run of build up fights, became active he was better versus Holyfield at an even more advanced age than he had been for Tyson.

    Another factor is the size difference. Willard was a weight class bigger and such a strong man. He withstood extra damage because his opponent was so much smaller. Dempsey could break his face without knocking him completely unconscious.

    Thirdly. The gloves and the way jack used them. Gunboat Smith talked of old gloves. The tape that could not be used today that was used then. It was hard adhesive vinyl tape. The gloves were 4oz. With 2oz in the wrist cuffs. Very little padding over the knuckles because you could manipulate the stuffing into the bottom of the mitt since it was horsehair rather than rubber foam. So you could have nothing but a thin layer of leather between the hard tape and Willards face.
     
    Vanboxingfan, BCS8 and dempsey1234 like this.
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Lets look at the facts:
    1. They used 4 oz gloves with shitty padding over the knuckles, it was practically just hand wraps.
    2. Jack was probably the hungriest contender in the history of boxing at that point. (Opinion)
    3. He ripped through every contender in a couple of rds up to the Willard fight.
    4. Practically every punch landed for the rest of the rd that he threw after the initial onslaught began about 1 minute into the fight. Imagine, being Dempsey's punching bag for 2 minutes straight. It would probably kill most people.
     
    BCS8, RockyJim and dempsey1234 like this.
  4. Chuck1052

    Chuck1052 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,977
    623
    Sep 22, 2013
    In regards to the allegation that Jack Dempsey had loaded gloves in his bout with Jess Willard, I don't believe it. Jack Kearns, Dempsey's manager at the time, stated in his autobiography that plaster of Paris was put on Dempsey's fists, but Kearns had quite a reputation for being less than truthful. Besides having plenty of punching power, Dempsey was far quicker, much younger and in far better condition and had more relatively recent bouts than Willard, who didn't have a bout for three years at the time he faced Dempsey.

    I have a number of biographies and three different autobiographies of Dempsey. In my opinion, one should wary about depending on such books about Dempsey for accurate information. Of course, that can also be said about other books on the subject of boxing.

    - Chuck Johnston
     
    dempsey1234 likes this.
  5. AliMyths&Legends

    AliMyths&Legends Active Member banned Full Member

    544
    253
    Jan 4, 2017
    I understand this, but the opinion at the time was Dempsey caused more damage to Willard, than any opponent before, or after.

    He knocked Willard down for the first time in Willard's career, and not once but six times. Dempsey broke his ribs, shattered his jaw, broke his nose, broke out four of his teeth, gave him partial hearing loss, broke his cheek bone, numerous cuts etc.

    I think either the damage was highly exaggerated?
    Or Dempsey did in fact cause the same damage to other oppoents?
    Or he had loaded gloves for the bout with Willard?

    I am not hating on Dempsey for anyone who thinks I am. It has been pointed out from what I have read that he caused massive damage to Willard unlike any oppoent before, or after. I am just wanted to discuss why that might be.
     
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,623
    Mar 17, 2010
    Although Willard hadn't fought in three years, he was still staying active in exhibitions and charity bouts.

    He was set to fight Fulton in 1917, but the public turned on Jess after they read about his $100,000 purse demands right when Influenza hit. There was even a popular political cartoon at the time depicting Willard and Fulton stealing money from the American people. So that fight was canceled.

    Soon after, America entered WW1, leaving a championship boxing match even further out of the question.

    I believe it's important that people know that Willard wasn't just lounging around his farm, but actively tried defending the title since 1917.

    Also, he said that he had still been excercising every day during his layoff. But that his body started gaining weight faster than normal.
     
  7. AliMyths&Legends

    AliMyths&Legends Active Member banned Full Member

    544
    253
    Jan 4, 2017
    I read the first two articles last night. I will read the others. I am interested to hear more of what people on here think though, that is why I started this thread.
     
  8. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    No the damage was done. It shows clearly on the fight footage.
    Idk how badly he hurt other opponents because we have no film on his prior fights. Against his prior opponents he had them out of there in a rd. Willard stayed in for a couple extra rds which definitely caused him to suffer more damage. His chin was obviously very good.

    There were no loaded gloves.
     
  9. AliMyths&Legends

    AliMyths&Legends Active Member banned Full Member

    544
    253
    Jan 4, 2017
    We have film footage of the fights after though.

    Willard's face was a mess no doubt, but could a lot of the damage I listed be exaggerated?
     
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,066
    22,118
    Jul 21, 2012
    They said Joe Louis had loaded gloves for the Schmeling rematch.
     
  11. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I'm not denying he didn't do that damage to other opponents. In fact I fully support that he didn't.

    Willard was practically a punching bag for the last 2 minutes of the first rd and took a lot of punishment in the second and third rds. There is no doubt that Dempsey could inflict that kind of damage with only his fists.
     
  12. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012
    I would say most on here would agree with what the articles had to say. Whatever suits you best.
     
  13. AliMyths&Legends

    AliMyths&Legends Active Member banned Full Member

    544
    253
    Jan 4, 2017
    I also have one of Joe Louis's book. I have not got round to reading it yet. Do you think there was any truth to Louis having loaded gloves?
     
  14. AliMyths&Legends

    AliMyths&Legends Active Member banned Full Member

    544
    253
    Jan 4, 2017
    I am not saying either way.

    Like I said I read the book so far, and read the first two articles you provided.

    I like to hear what others think about it though. I do think it is a very interesting topic.