Jack Dempsey on Boxing from 1950

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vic-JofreBRASIL, Apr 7, 2012.


  1. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    These statements below are from the book "Championship Fighting" By Jack Dempsey written in 1950. Many of you must have read, but I want to share here...

    Check it out.....

    ------------

    First of all, I really like Dempsey and his book is great... it shows he knew a lot about boxing, a great read that book......probably is my favorite in terms of boxing lessons, seriously !

    I´m not actually criticizing Dempseys view here, and I don´t want this thread to turn into some Dempsey debate related like millions in this forum, please....
    I love every boxing era, and I just think maybe it wasn´t a fair critic about the 50´s, that´s all....and then I´m honestly just wondering what you guys think about this........
    AND as many here know it is not like only Dempsey said things like these towards current eras......
    You hear things like that from fighters of differents eras towards others...etc...

    It seems obvious to me that 50´s was a wonderful and rich era with many great fighters and trainers in US, and around the World in many countries boxing got bigger those days like never was before, which helped to actually improve the level in some aspects IMHO....

    What do you think about these statements ? I thought it would be nice to hear opinions on that...
    I think it´s a good subject for a good debate.....:bbb (and probably very controversial)

    We´ll see.......Discuss !
     
  2. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
  3. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    I think in simple terms it can translate that as the sheer number of fighters grew (mid 30s - late 50s), you would certainly see a lot of Club fighters.

    But the Top were Great fighters too, and as we know they became the GREATEST in history, numbers also meant tougher competition and longer & harder roads to the TOP.

    likewise the decline of the sport also brought lesser numbers of fighters, poorer competition and even some of our Top fighters are not much to shout about, some are though, obviously.
     
  4. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    I think it was pretty much taken for granted in the 1950s that boxing in America had declined since the pre-ww2 days.

    Lots of small venues had closed down, TV was making a huge impact in eliminating these small clubs and killing their chances of survival ... and America had become a more prosperous nation !
    There were less professional fighters than in the pre-war days.
    It was a much noted phenomenon, not just Dempsey or a few old-timers saying "fighters were better back when".
     
  5. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    it was the mid to late 50s when this happened, and thats what I said in my post, and I agree with your understanding of that too.
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    ESB in the 50's would've been no different from ESB now, in terms of what they'd think about "today's" fighters. Only difference is we'd all wear hats.
     
  7. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    :lol::deal
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,102
    Feb 15, 2006
    The two heavyweight contenders from that period that Dempsey picked to be world beaters were Rex Layne and Bob Baker.

    He was almost right, but he was clearly not giving suficient credit to the cuties.
     
  9. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    Layne and Baker were better than Firpo for example, a top fighter from his era....
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,102
    Feb 15, 2006
    Perhaps, but Dempsey wasn't looking at them as the next Firpo.

    He was looking at them as the nearest thing that could be found to himself.
     
  11. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    It was starting to happen in the early 50s, esp. the ominous signs of TV's impact on the small clubs, in America anyway.
    Many (not all) of the great fighters of the 1950s were guys who had been fighting before 1942 (Moore, Robinson, Pep, Walcott, Charles etc.)
     
  12. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010

    :lol: True.

    It's the old "Back in my day...blah, blah, blah, blah"

    Everything becomes greater the older you get too.

    It's great we have Film/Youtube
     
  13. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    Oh....and I must say it again, the book was written in 1950.......so, actually, the thread title may give the wrong impression......Sorry by that.....
    Dempsey wasn´t talking about anything after 1950.....

    Thread title edited btw
     
  14. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    :lol::lol:


    Foreman Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!:hat
     
  15. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Boxing, as a whole, was thought to be in decline in the post-war years.
    The impact of television was being felt by 1950. Too few fighters coming through, a small number of veteran stars keeping the game alive (primarily Ray Robinson)
    This is reported and commented on ad naseum in the press at the time.
    In America anyway.