Jack Dempsey vs George Foreman.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JohnThomas1, May 30, 2016.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,172
    47,159
    Feb 11, 2005
    If Jack fights him like he did Willard, is patient and circles and waits for big openings, he could have some early success. Sooner or later, prime George's footwork, much quicker and better schooled than Jess', would narrow the window. If Jack doesn't KO him before this, it looks grim. I'm favoring George 80/20.
     
  2. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,649
    2,538
    Nov 6, 2011
    Excellent point, Somehow I don't see Dempsey holding up to Foreman's work of body punching.
     
  3. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,534
    9,611
    Oct 22, 2015
    See Frazier vs Foreman, maybe a little faster, Foreman pushes him off balance sticks that pole axe left jab out followed by a right hook or uppercut. Good night Jack.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,630
    27,325
    Feb 15, 2006
    Dempsey is one of the few swarmers who would have a very real chance against Foreman, because he could play the matador.

    Trouble is that he is always going to be one miscalculation away from disaster.
     
  5. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Dempsey has the wheels and punching power to win this one but he is facing as devastating a puncher as they come. Dempsey would start as he did with Willard boxing in and out. Staying at distance side stepping and then bobbing under his opponents guard to get in close where Foremans sweeping punches are nullified. Here he lands quickly to body and head to the refs break...then the process resumes. George tries cutting the ring but Dempsey is too elusive. George's jab which is a formable weapon is nullified as Demosey is staying at long distance or in close. George has trouble timing him. If he can keep out of Foremans power shot range rounds go by and George gets more battered and more spent. After 7-10 rounds it's all Dempsey leading to at ko win in 12. Dempsey would have to fight the perfect game plan and he has the skills to pull it off.
     
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    The best assessment
     
  7. sauhund II

    sauhund II Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    2,204
    Nov 8, 2008
    Comparing cave man Willard to Foreman is ignorance ten fold.

    Dempsey would not have a chance to "box", Foreman would put him on the backfoot immediately , force a fire fight and Good Night Dempsey.

    But the fight would never happen, Foreman to black for Dempseys handlers.
     
  8. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    :happy:good
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,630
    27,325
    Feb 15, 2006
    It is hard to put somebody on the back foot, if they are circling you.
     
  10. sauhund II

    sauhund II Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    2,204
    Nov 8, 2008
    Hey jani, can you re post the pic of you , all 105 pounds , again like you did some years back ?
     
  11. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    Dempsey bombs out foreman IMO...Foreman's lack of defense and swinging punches would spell disaster for him.thanks
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,630
    27,325
    Feb 15, 2006
    I don’t think I have ever posted a picture of myself on this forum?
     
  13. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,244
    17,941
    Apr 26, 2006
    Foreman by ko inside 3 rounds...are we talking 1972 Foreman ?
     
  14. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,662
    11,847
    Jul 1, 2010
    A cruiserweight vs one of the biggest punchers the world has ever seen?

    Hmmmmmmm. Tough one(!)
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,131
    45,140
    Apr 27, 2005
    Well that makes his opinion null and void then.