Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by swagdelfadeel, Sep 8, 2014.
this Is new a legend not giving his thoughts on my response which is realistic
Jack was never a quitter...was he?
A legend ? Me ? Lol
You haven't heard the bards singing the Lay of Magoo?
I must have missed that one !
LOL sarcasm i see. Just answer me this. Why do you think Mike Tyson beats George Foreman ?
well yea all of you people who been here for years are legends who have said logic which I only respect logic posters
sarcasm no saying the same you said to me last night forgot that huh
If your asking me a dumb question I wont answer cause it's no need and its not a thought you forgot
it's odd asking me why do I think something
thought you noticed by now I dont talk in unrealistic opinions like you followers you can tell me why you think George could win if he fought like his 90s style but his young ver it wasnt there so I dont know why you think he could win cause from matches I seen he was easy to counter and he missed mutiple easy shots with no names
I shouldnt have to tell you why I know mike or other people would beat George when tom did who fought the best skilled George
when the young George had no defense and like I said missed mutiple punches all the time it's like a real dumb question
For those who are curious, I edited your punctuation in the above quote to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, you are indeed typing coherent sentences. I just couldn't get the last part.
EDIT: Got it.
when tom beat George people say he moved away it doesn't matter if he did or didnt his punch style was like mike and he came in mutiple times and wasnt just beat up the way people like to pretend would happen with everybody who came to George
Ohhh. Tommy Morrison. Got it. Will edit.
Foreman was old as hell and even slower than he was in his prime at that point and Tommy Morrison didn't fight like Mike Tyson in that fight anyway. How about lets mention Mike Tyson getting manhandled and beat up by Holyfield.
well you need to watch the match agian cause tom did he threw wide punches like mike and used similar style head movement and ducking style so a lie you said there
you dont do good at seeing every detail like me I see
Tom's style was always like mike just not as good most people can see that his difference was that he could fight off clinching and was more a inside fighter but came in and out and mike was more just a waiter and counter type but same wide punch style like I said
tom would even do 3 punch combos like Mike but was more just out of random mike didnt do his like that often he usally did combos off counters so you dont know what your talking about
how about mike was a downgraded ver when he fought the best ver of holy which is any holy in the 90s which means anybody vs that holy has a problem so dumb point
cause if that had been the real mike vs young holy that holy gets beats
I have said to holy punch style was like louis in style it's just holy couldnt give the same effect of making his victims freeze from stinging shots cause of the advanced movement of the era
it doesn't matter if George was slower his punch tech was better he wasnt just dumb like he was when he was young wasting punches
he picked punches
he had more energy
he was way tougher to taking shots
so that George was better even though your trying to act like these facts is bull it's on vid
After reading Pollocks book. I got Dempsey by early KO