Jack Dempsey vs. Jack Johnson: Did it happen?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Jan 1, 2016.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
  2. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,587
    2,493
    Nov 6, 2011
    It made me laugh how his first thought was that Johnson was in desperate need of money, instead of considering Johnson almost certainly wouldn't have performed as well as this article describes, because I have no doubt Johnson would have gloated about dropping the current heavyweight champion. There's also Dempsey drawing the colour line and this exception of crossing that line for a wad of cash, something's he had plenty of, at the risk of his reputation and legacy seems very odd.
     
  3. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    i have a scan of a newspaper report on this somewhere. must try and find and post here.
     
  4. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    i think it was a journalist trying to be obviously telling a fantasy..but it was taken seriously by some. i think thats what the story was.
     
  5. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    This fable is a bunch of malarkey. To think that a Jack Kearns would for no reason match his young tiger money machine with the 43 year old shot Jack Johnson is ludicrous. Dempsey had no reason to fight this old version of Lil Arthur with a few witnesses. And this fight would go unnoticed all these years smacks of insanity..
     
  6. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    This has already been debunked several times. It was an article on a fantasy matchup that was eventually reprinted as true in a boxing magazine years later for April Fools.
     
  7. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
  8. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    It just shows how gullible you Yanks are.



    Orson Welles War Of The World's?:patsch
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,581
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am going to assume that it didn’t happen, unless some absolutely blinding new evidence emerges.
     
  12. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    no need to assume. the article itself explains that it is a work of fantasy only. in the link above.
     
  13. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,968
    2,411
    Jul 11, 2005
    Too bad they didn't find the 2nd part of the series that had Joe Gans (who was dead for over 11 years at that point) beating Benny Leonard by narrow margin... I wonder what explanation they would come up with for that one.
     
  14. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    you had a wonderful blog which i got some great reading out of....really appreciated you doing it...don't think i have said it to you before.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    New pugilistic discoveries are being made as we speak!