Jack Dempsey vs Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ribtickler68, May 20, 2016.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,142
    25,330
    Jan 3, 2007
    All the above is true
     
  2. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Again with this **** about Dempsey had "loaded" gloves against Willard. It is so discredited your bull agenda, as Nat fleischer and corner men from Willards corner were in Dempseys dressing room watching his hands being taped and even YOU can see film of Dempsey entering
    the ring without any gloves, EVEN YOU. You sir can utter your own opinions, but NOT YOUR OWN "FACTS"...What is this form coming to ?
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    You have a thing for telling lies about loaded gloves
    don't you.
    Mathis and Quarry were on their feet at the finish, Ellis was
    retired on his stool ,stop with the BS.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
    There are basically two ways to beat Dempsey.

    You either prevent most of his punches from hitting you, or you get him before he gets you.

    If your plan involves going toe to toe with him, and taking what he throws at you for a number of rounds, you are going to lose.
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I would think that you of all people woi5ld be reluctant to use such a generalizatipn here given that nobody as Great or accomplished as a prime Joe Frazier ever went toe to toe with Dempsey...
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
    This is true enough, but Dempsey is a much faster starter, and a much better finisher.

    The chances are that he gets Frazier, before Frazier gets him.

    Obviously we can’t say what would happen, but I think a scenario where Frazier weathers the early storm to assert himself late, is highly unlikely.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    Plus Dempsey had two good hands and a better chin.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,521
    21,903
    Sep 15, 2009
    Dempsey isn't good enough to give up 20 pounds of weight against Frazier. Very few are.

    Give Dempsey time to bulk up to a comparable weight and I say he's still the quicker man, definitely the harder puncher and would get the job done within 5.
     
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Seems like that line of argument would also provide a good basis for favoring Tua against Frazier... :think
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
    It would on the face of it, but there would be a number of factors to counter it.

    Notably Tua’s failure to replicate his finishing prowess against the better fighters of the era.
     
  11. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Dempsey had weighed in at times during his career at or around 200. Some would say he was just as powerful at that weight.
     
  12. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Dempsey at 185-190 destroys prime Frazier at 205. 15-20 pounds would be meaningless. Dempseys quick start combined with Frazier not smoking until round five spells early doom. In close Dempsey would shine as he would pile drive shots up the middle while Joe tended to rely on the hook to the side. Dempsey would be inside Fraziers punches twisting to the left and right as he pumps devastating punches to body then head.
     
  13. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    It didn't take 5 rounds for Joe to start smoking. :huh
     
  14. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    Wow, Joe's getting taken out like that? Dempsey was no Foreman.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    No he was a damn sight quicker!