Jack Dempsey vs. Michael Spinks-Both At Their Best-Who Wins?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janwalshs, Jul 25, 2024.


Dempsey vs. Spinks

  1. 1. Demsey By KO

    19 vote(s)
    63.3%
  2. 2. Dempsey By Decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 3. Spinks By KO

    5 vote(s)
    16.7%
  4. 4. Spinks By Decision

    6 vote(s)
    20.0%
  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,272
    11,726
    Sep 21, 2017
    Spinks would by far be one of the most skilled fighters that Dempsey ever shared a ring with. Dempsey was about 190 pounds and not as skilled as a peak 218 pound 1988 Mike Tyson. Just because Tyson flattened Spinks in 1 doesn't mean Dempsey repeats it. Spinks, at 6'2 208 pounds (his weight for the Cooney fight) would make him taller and bigger than Dempsey. Plus, I suspect that he had enough ammo in that Spinks jinx to hurt Dempsey. Sharkey, Carpantier and Tunney could hurt Dempsey, a heavyweight Spinks could as well.

    I say Dempsey by KO, but he will struggle and probably get his bell rung a few times in the process.
     
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,981
    19,025
    Oct 4, 2016
    Spinks couldn't walk through Qawi, he sure ain't walking over Jack Dempsey
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,628
    46,262
    Feb 11, 2005
    Spinks is too good a boxer, too hard a puncher, to mobile, too black.
     
    janwalshs likes this.