It's not that relevant actually, as far as the original point goes. Maybe Dempsey would bring that kind of plan, but where is the proof? On film he only ever brought that type of plan to the ring once and he was found enormously lacking specifically in this area where people are now insisting he would have done the business against a bigger, better, harder hitting fighter who was probably also faster. I mean whatever else exists of Dempsey on film, there is absolutely nothing that indicates he could keep anything like a Frazier-like pressure on a box-mover of this class. Tyson has footspeed equal to or better than Dempsey's, say, and he absolutely does not have the technical capability to do so. All the indications are that the same would be true of Jack. And yet people are trying to claim a style advantage for him.
I have no problem with the answer - Billy Miske had bright's disease and maybe Foreman was a trifle to warm. I don't really care. Miske is correct and there might be more. The point i'm making is that Ali, just like the great punchers, cracked great chins, uncrackable chins. He didn't do this with power punching one-shot monster blows, we know that. But accumulation isn't just another way of saying "no power, wore him down". I promise you that you need to be able to hit very very hard as a pro-fighter to be able to drop Foreman for 10 or Bonavena three times in a round. That they are tired and beat up when it happens is only a sliver of the story - you still need the punch. By the way, does anyone have anything on what Dempsey says about Miske? Does he flat out admit that it was a soft defence against a friend that needed cash?
Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack another point. All I know is that Dempsey was a fast-footed pressure fighter. He can be seen coming forward up on his toes, throwing plenty of punches punches for 15 rounds on film against Gibbons, and for most of 12 against Brennan. I'm not saying he beats Ali. But he tended to come forward fast on his feet and apply pressure, which is something Frazier did also. Well, it was just the way he fought. That should be an indication of sorts. Of course, he never fought an Ali. But we can speculate. I disagree. Films of Tyson against Tucker shows that he often became a flat-footed heavy-legged fighter in longer fights in his prime, he loses a lot of foot speed or for whatever reason doesn't sustain it. Dempsey chased guys up on his toes for 10, 15 rounds. The films show that.
Yeah, he did fight an Ali, and he just wasn't fast enough. He wasn't fast enough at all in terms of pressure he brought. Maybe he brought much faster pressure and could have done so for 10 rounds against a fighter like Tunney - never mind a fighter like Ali - when he was younger but the evidence is scant. Neither one of them every successfully pursued any fighter like Tunney or Ali for 10 or 15 rounds. Tyson is proven technically as having the ability to apply fast pressure, just as Dempsey is. Dempsey did it once for a glut of rounds on film agianst a fighter who was nothing like Tunney or a Ali.
I don't think you can read into too much from what Dempsey says, he came across arrogant in his retirement, what I would like to read more on is Dempsey-Miske 1 in 1918, which Miske may well have won I don't think Ali hit THAT HARD, but accuracy, placement, timing and speed can make up for that, he hit hard enough. Just because someone's not an obviously brutal puncher, people think they are easy to walk down, big mistake Punching power is probably the most over rated attribute anyway
Given the topic of Ali-Dempsey, isn't it interesting both Ali and Tunney were afraid of Liston and Dempsey before they faced them. Ali whispered to Dundee 'do you think we can pull this off' before entering the ring. Tunney used to wake up in the middle of the night having nightmares of Dempsey
understandable, both fear inspiring figures. i'm sure buster metaphorically pissed the bed a bit too.
There's quite a bit of post-fight commentary on Dempsey-Tunney from observers who noted Dempsey's legs were gone, that he'd lost a step or two and gone flat-footed. To me he looks different on the film from the Willard and Gibbons and Brennan fights. But, yes, Tunney was better than those men. We can only speculate then.