Jack Dempsey vs Tony Tucker?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KeedCubano, Jun 4, 2020.


  1. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    You never put me down you idiot, you have no arguments whatsoever.
    You're the stupidest poster on this forum and the only one who believes Holyfield beat Lewis.
     
  2. SerbianLoudmouth

    SerbianLoudmouth Overhand right-Suzie Q Full Member

    1,258
    744
    May 3, 2019
    Yes,I did and only idiot here is you because you have no weapons instead of insulting which proves that you are moroinc idiot and stupid troll!
    I already debunked a moron like you and stupida troll!He achieved that against better guys with better records instead of big bums!I would prove you are stupid again!
    He scored 68 knockout wins (23 in the first round) and holds a 91.8% knockout-to-win ratio!
    Not only that but in that record there are more HOFamers and good contenders instead your ko ratio against big bums with nore losses than wins!
    Not only that he did that in one year and knocked all opponents he faced in only one year!having knocked out 50 opponents in three rounds or less; 24 in the first round.
    Ali,Qiarry,Ellis,Norton...are HOFamers and they are better than big bums without any good record!
    I again proved my point!
    Walcott faced big and small guys,most of them were good like Joey Maxim who beat Patterson!He faced many big guys like Hein and Shkor who were 6ft 4 and with huge reachs,Joe Louis big guy also,Jimmy Bivins and Ray Elmer also HOfamers and big guys,Ezzard Charles and Johnson who were champions...yeah bums only in your stupid mind!
    Walcott stand great chance!He is better and more durable than Tucker or Tillis!
    Charles was better boxer than Tyson and was same as Holyfield who beat Tyson!Charles and Holy shared same style even looked similar!
    Louis was better than Tyson in everything!He had faster hands,better jab,better reach and was better combo puncher!
    They were both better than Tyson and their records prove that!
    Foreman was never knocked out,just went down because of echaustion!Only stupid man again is you stupid troll!Tunney can withstand more punishment because he was moving and would not give his opponents to punch him!You imbecile not being KO means you have helluva chin!So by your stupid logic McCall and Chuvalo didn't have good chin because they were never knocked which means they didn't have good chin?Only imbecile and moron is you!Taking blows by everyone means you have good chin!Clueless bum!
    Tunney fought man all size smaller and bigger but they were HOfamers!Hary Greb was better than Duane Bobick or Johny Shkor but by your stupid logic they are better because they are bigger!He faced great punchers such a past prime Dempsey who could still KO,Greb who punched like top HWs and,Gibbons,Carpentier and Lougharn!They were top punchers back then stupid troll!
    Now stupid troll,go home and then think twice before you wrote something stupid like this because next time I wpuld put you so down you'll be crying like a baby!
    Now go home and get yourself a shinebox and read more about boxing record you bum!
     
  3. SerbianLoudmouth

    SerbianLoudmouth Overhand right-Suzie Q Full Member

    1,258
    744
    May 3, 2019
    I put you stupid troll with very good arguments but you are angry just like every stupid man eho faced facts when I proved they just wrote lies!I show well known and documented arguments but you again insult like every stupid arsehole!
    Only stupid here is you and all people make laugh of you because they don't take you seriously because you are stupid troll!
    Holyfield beat Lewis in second fight in first it was a draw!And that was ancient Holyfield!
     
  4. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    Lewis won both fights comfortably, especially the first one when he was ROBBED.
     
  5. SerbianLoudmouth

    SerbianLoudmouth Overhand right-Suzie Q Full Member

    1,258
    744
    May 3, 2019
    According to boxrec,wikipedia.. he did not!Lewis got a draw it was even more close than Tua Ibeabuchi!Next time they met Holyfield won fair and square and was robbed!Every man who scored even the ones who hate Holyfield they scored in his favor!Lewis did not won anything!
     
  6. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    The vast majority were small men and bums.
    11 KO's in 23 fights against proper HW's size wise.

    He got beat by Ali and Quarry.
    He could have been disqualified for holding Ellis' head with the left and then uppercutting
    And his fight with Bugner ended on a cut.
    His only good win is Norton, that's it.


    Hein, Shkor, Bivins and Elmer are bums. Tyson beats all 4 on the same night.

    Charles was good, but he's not a proper HW in terms of size.
    Louis was also great, but not as great as Tyson. Only a clueless idiot like you thinks he had faster hands than Tyson.

    Your stupidity has no boundaries. You are contradicting yourself and basically admitting that I am right.
    Don't you understand English you imbecile ????
    I said that a guy that gets punched and is able to take it has a good chin. I agree about McCall and Chuvalo.
    I do not agree about Tunney. Running away from punches and surviving the fight without getting KO'd does not mean you have a good chin. ****in' ******ed moron.


    That does not matter you ******. They were HOF for what they achieved in their era. They'd get mauled in other eras.

    Dempsey barely landed. Greb was never a big puncher, his stats prove that, clueless chump. That is the one asset he lacked.
    Gibbons,Carpentier and Lougharn were not proper HW's. Tyson beats all 3 on the same night.

    Now go home to your little country before it gets bombed again.