Jack Dempsey vs Wlad Klitschko

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jul 8, 2008.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    who do you like, the giant killer vs the giant
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,103
    Feb 15, 2006
    Timber!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,789
    47,642
    Mar 21, 2007
    I pick Dempsey.

    I'm not going to try to ignore this thread. Bet I can't.
     
  4. Sardu

    Sardu RIP Mr. Bun: 2007-2012 Full Member

    3,581
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    If Dempsey is able to slip Kitschko's jab and get inside he would probably be successful. Needless to say, the big men of today (Lennox, the Klitschko brothers, etc.) are much more athletic and skilled than the big guys of yesteryear. I see it as a pick em' fight with either Klit by late TKO or Dempsey by early knockout if he catches him.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    I think Dempsey at his very best like he was in the Wilalrd fight would win, but the Dempsey who fought Fripo, Brennan, and Sharkey would lose.
     
  6. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Dempsey by early KO. Wlad doesn't have the toughness or chin of Willard and would stay down.
     
  7. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    I agree with that. Dempsey at his peak was a monster but as his title reign went on he got worse and worse.
     
  8. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Klitschko is timid, weak chinned and has no inside game. Dempsey of Toledo would slaughter him.
     
  9. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    dempsey y early dimemberment
     
  10. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Dempsey he can win by KO...

    He was also a decent defensive fighter for a KO artsist. His speed and workrate would see him set a pace that Wlad couldn't match.
     
  11. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    No, but he does have boxing skill, athleticism and more than 1 fight in 3 years, not to mention he's not 37. Please don't compare him to that unskilled farm strong boy.
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Comparing Willard skill to the best modern super heavies of the 1990's to present is one of the worst mistakes historians or seasoned boxing fans make.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,789
    47,642
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's valid to compare them if all you are saying is, "they are tall".

    Who do you consider a good comparison for Wlad historically, or do you feel there isn't one?
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    A Great Dane dog and an Irish Wolf hound dog are also tall, but they are compeltely different looking and acting.

    The best comparison for Wlad historically is Lennox Lewis. I do not want to get into a who is better thread, but I do see many similarities between Wlad and Lewis.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,789
    47,642
    Mar 21, 2007
    An easy one...

    ;)

    Summarise your feelings on Saturday's fight?