Jack Demspey "sent Godoy reeling" in sparring, 1940

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jun 20, 2012.


  1. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,609
    46,241
    Feb 11, 2005
    A destruction that about 50 heavyweights since could have achieved.
     
  3. Toad

    Toad Member Full Member

    252
    0
    Aug 25, 2011
    i don't dispute that at all. but you have to remember that those 50 heavyweights mostly evolved from the olden days of jack dempsey. dempsey's style would be considered a bit primitive or inferior compared to let's say frazier or tyson, so the fact that he destroyed willard like he did with what he had was admirable.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,609
    46,241
    Feb 11, 2005
    He made the most of his opportunity, no doubt. I just don't think an old part time boxer, full-time oaf who was inactive is that great of a pelt.
     
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,264
    15,327
    Jun 9, 2007
    Im not knocking Joe. I love Joe, traines at his gym but Dempsey was better.
     
  6. Toad

    Toad Member Full Member

    252
    0
    Aug 25, 2011
    frazier beat a very, very good version of ali who is probably the greatest HW of all time. he beat bugner, a very good contender. he beat quarry, ellis and foster also. the ali win and quarry wins were very good and i think smoke is better than dempsey.
     
  7. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,264
    15,327
    Jun 9, 2007
    Your intitled to your opinion as I am mine. In my book if you put them both in a ring in there primes, Dempsey wins.
     
  8. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I'm a huge Dempsey fan, but why is it whenever we discuss Dempsey-Tunney the three year lay off is always brought up, but Willards.similar inactivity is never mentioned.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,609
    46,241
    Feb 11, 2005
    Nor is Willard's age of 37. Look, Willard was Dempsey's route to the title. I don't ridicule him for taking the fight and certainly congratulate him for the manner in which he dispatched the old farmhand. But, as a purely boxing victory, I am not as impressed. It's not like he met a formidable, well-rounded champion in his prime. He met an old, relatively novice, inactive Champ who was physically well past it.
     
  10. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    But NAT FLEISCHER, THE EXPERT, KNOWS BETTER THAN YOU, NAYSAYER. WHO ARE YOU TO QUESTION HIM, REVISIONIST.....?


    ....cheers...
     
  11. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Personality wise i don't think he's much at all like Duran from what i can gather. They have being a psycho in common, but he's more humble and classy than Duran, and definatley smarter.

    I'd say he's more like a Nigel Benn type of character
     
  12. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Also Dempsey never needed to poo. Ever.
     
  13. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I meant more in the ring than out
     
  14. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    :rofl