Jack Johnson Agrees To defend Against Sam McVey For $30,000

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jun 27, 2016.


  1. TheOldTimer

    TheOldTimer Active Member Full Member

    894
    173
    Sep 6, 2013
    but history shows he fights never happened so you can but and maybe all you want.
    Like I said before Johnson would have rather kept the distinction to himself and was probably pleased those title shots never materialised.
    He'd already beaten them handily previously anyway so its not as if he wanted the fights made for his own pride i.e. to prove himself against the best as in his mind he had already done so.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    The poster Mcvey is on his own personal jihad on this topic. He'll make excuses, ignore facts. and headlines that do not suit his agenda, and sometimes take it personally if you post too much content. You will not be successful changing his mind, even if it's the truth or Jack Johnson's own words.

    He will act as if Johnson win over Sam McVey ( who was a teenager with just one year's experience ) , and consider it a great win as if they fought in their primes.

    He will act as if Johnson's win over a 20-year-old sam Langford, who was then 156 pounds, and consider it a great win as if they fought in their primes.

    He will act as if Johnson wins over a novice Jeannette, who sometimes had a losing record when he fought Johnson and consider it a great win as if they fought in their primes.

    The funny thing is when Johnson meet fighters close to their primes with ability, he lost!

    KO'd in 3 by Choynski, Choysnki slightly past his prime
    Lost to Griffin on points, Griffin slightly past his prime
    Lost to Hart on points. Hart in his prime, same as Johnson

    Now, Choysnki, Griffin, and Hart as a group were not greater than prime versions of Langford, Jeannette or McVey...but then again Johnson never fought one of them in their primes.

    He did fight Gunboat Smith in an exhibition match. Smith had the ability and defeated Moran and Willard, two men who Johnson gave title shots. Smith TKO'd Jack at the end of the fourth according to the report that says Johnson was dazed, and down, his manager stopped it.

    Rounding out his terrible title defenses as champion is the Ross fight, which was a joke if you look at Ross record in the last five fights leading up to the match, a match vs super middleweight O'Brien who outboxed Johnson and made him look bad, and match with a crude swing Ketchel, another upper middleweight who floored him.

    Any quality champion should have KO'd these three without being outboxed or floored. Yet Johnson to some gets a pass.

    You are correct. Johnson as champion can say where and when, he just never chose to fight McVey, Jeannette or Langford, and there were plenty of offers from various promoters and plenty of nations and venues for him to select. I'd add Gunboat Smith to that list as well, as you can argue for a few years while Johnson was champion rated in the top 4.
     
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    It's a mute point really. Johnson was considered head and shoulders BETTER than McVey, Langford and Jeanette DURING that time.

    Arguing that Johnson would lose to any of these three flies in the face of the actual thought of that time period.

    Why these three did not get title shots has been argued for decades but it boils down to money. Would Ali fight Frazier for $100,000?..... in general NO. Would Ali jump to fight Richard Dunn for a million? You bet.

    The real reason why Jeffries retired was the upcoming black contenders.....Johnson, McVey, Jeanette and Langford. (Fleischer. 50 Years at Ringside).
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Perry,

    Calling McVey, Langford, and Jeannette " flies " suggest you don't think too much of them. They are hall of fame fighters and did very well vs .the rest of the field when you exclude the matches between themselves.

    They were also in their prime from 1909-1914, which are years that Johnson was the champion and was better than any man Johnson gave a title shot to, with the possible exception of Willard who knocked him out.

    If you look at Jeanette he was greatly improved by 1906, in fact, he drew with Johnson in their last fight despite being a professional for two years with no amateur experience.

    Jeffries last fight was 1904, until his comeback in 1910. He retired post Jack Munroe which happened in August 1904.

    Please read the below and think about it:

    Are you aware Langford who's manager once said he'd fight any man but Jeffries was just 141 pounds for his December 1904 fight with Jack Blackburn, and likely under 20-year-old?

    Do you realize JEanette's debut was November 1904?
    He started out 0-3 and did not win a fight until 1905!

    No way these two were on Jeffries radar.

    Do you realize Sam Mcvey was an 8-4 by the end of 1904, then quit boxing in 1905 after questioning being himself losing to Martin?

    The logical and only conclusion is Jeffries did not retire in 1904 to avoid these three. He was in his prime at age 29 1904.

    Nat Fleischer quote from 50 years at ringside is obviously very flawed and if he were alive today, he'd change his mind. Nat changed his mind often but lacked the data we have today called the internet.

    You could argue Johnson for a 1.5 year period was the top challenger but after he lost to Hart in 1905, that obstacle was removed. Jeffries said he'd fight Hart. No one wanted to pay to see a quick fight.

    As for who was considered above whom in 1909-1914, that does to matter with class fighters unless they fight. Boxing history is full of 100's of examples where the presumed favorite lost.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    History shows he signed to fight them but through no fault of his own the offers were withdrawn.
    There's no maybees about it we have documented proof he signed contracts to fight Langford,McVey and Jeannette, we know where the fights were to be held and when ,and how much Johnson's purse was to be.

    I expect he was happy toying with the lesser talented poor crop of white hopes for the same money but that was down to the White public who wanted a White man to depose him.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    How many times have you been told .You cannot be tko'd in a sparring match. Don't you get tired trotting out the same old lies again and again? Because we we sure get tired reading them.
    I've produced documented proof that Johnson signed to fight Langford,McVey, and Jeannette in1912.

    You've produced f*ck all. But there is still time, I've only been asking for these proven offers for 3 weeks!

    Smith was in the top 4 for a few years?
    Care to say which years in particular?

    As to Smith's knockdown of Johnson in a sparring match Adam's book states as many thought it was a stunt , or a slip as a genuine KD, not that it's important, many champions are knocked down in sparring . Marciano,Vitali ,Tyson to name three off the top of my head.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    In their series Johnson knocked Jeannette down a total of 9 times:think

    Jeannette improved by 1906 ,and Johnson didn't?

    Three of McVey's 4 losses were to Johnson ,the other to the best black fighter before those two, Denver Ed Martin who also challenged Jeffries only to be ignored.
    Jeffries was offered a $20,000 guarantee to defend against black Champion Sam McVey he ignored it.
    They are Hall Of Fame fighters with one thing in common, they were all beaten by Jack Johnson!
    What were the spectators expecting when Jeffries defended against Jack Munroe a titanic struggle?:lol:
    Fleischer has one advantage over any living boxing expert, he saw Jack Johnson fight in the flesh, from ringside ,up close, and personal, he also saw every heavyweight champion up to and including Ali's first reign.
    ,
    He never changed his mind about who was the number one all time heavyweight .Jack Johnson!

    Adam Pollack is of the opinion that had Johnson been given a title shot in1903 which in his words" he desired and deserved," he may have had a reign of ten/ eleven years. And he points out that "even with having to wait until 1908 when he was 30 years old he still reigned for over 6 years".

    " Some quibble about the fact that he did not defend against the best black fighters of his era. However he did defeat them all prior to becoming champion,and he was willing to fight them all if his price was met."



    Adam's excellent two volumed biography of Jack Johnson The Rise vol1.The Reign vol2 ,contain8 indexed pages of references and 710 pages in volume 1, 9 pages of indexed references and 879 pages in vol 2.
    For a combined total of 1,589 pages,

    I'm going to take his opinions in his scrupulously researched and very positively reviewed books over your phobic ,tunnel visioned,agenda driven hatred,and I have to tell you it wasn't a difficult decision to make!

    N.B. I suggest your read Perry's post again,he isn't calling them flies!:lol::patsch
     
  8. TheOldTimer

    TheOldTimer Active Member Full Member

    894
    173
    Sep 6, 2013
    It must be said that after Johnson won the title other black contenders thought times were changing and most were expecting a free for all of black challengers fighting for the title, this was not to be so, not only because of Johnson's reluctance but also because the establishment was not about to let that happen.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Do you think that if say Joe Jeannette had beaten Burns, he would have defended against Jack Johnson a man who had dropped him 9 times in 7 fights a man a man he only beat once in their series and that on a disputed foul? How about McVey ,who Johnson beat three out of three, stopping him in their last fight after giving him a bad beating ,would he have been up for a defence against Johnson?
    Little Langford whom Johnson had dropped twice for 9 counts ,had cut his eye and broke his nose ?Would he want to defend against a fellow black for a reduced purse?

    If Johnson's demand of $30,000 was met he proved over and over he was willing to fight any man.
     
  10. TheOldTimer

    TheOldTimer Active Member Full Member

    894
    173
    Sep 6, 2013
    What would have happened had it been Jeanette or Mcvey or another getting the shot is down to speculation but as my previous post highlighted even if Johnson had begged to face these men other factors primarily racism would have stopped the fights from happening.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    The boxing public was white so their £$£$ dictated who fought for the heavyweight title they had no interest in seeing two blacks contending for it,consequently ,knowing they would not draw big gates with black v black matches ,promoters matched Johnson with a succession of white hopes.
     
  12. TheOldTimer

    TheOldTimer Active Member Full Member

    894
    173
    Sep 6, 2013
    Revisionists history.
    Its not a coincidence that Johnson fought only one black fighter of note again after winning the title despite dozens beforehand. He simply did not want too. He might have thought he could win those fights but he also knew they were the toughest match-ups for him and he wasn't getting any younger.
    The establishment were not going to allow a free for all of black challengers.
    He was the one, and the only one.

    "Johnson was so proud to be the first black heavyweight champion, he wanted to be the only black heavyweight champion and so he drew the color line himself".
    Bert Sugar.
     
  13. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    You are very wrong.

    Where am I calling anyone "flies"? You are misinterpreting that sentence. What I am saying is your thoughts concerning this matter run AGAINST the general thought of that time period.

    Fleischer was on the money. It was the RISE of the great black hwt fighters that convinced Jeffries to retire. Johnson was calling Jeff out constantly and he could see others on the horizon. Jeff did not want to be put in a position where he had to fight a black fighter. Now do I think he was afraid to fight any man? No. However all hwt champions knew the social ramifications of giving a black hwt credibility by giving them a title shot. And heaven forbid if they should lose to a black man. A great percentage of the public did not want this to occur
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes you believe Bert Sugar and I'll believe the man who wrote two first class diligently researched biographies on Johnson ,Adam Pollack.
    "You can lead someone to water ,but you can't make them think."
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jeffries countless times said he would retire rather than risk losing his title to a black man.

    "When there are no more white challengers left to fight I shall retire,I won't take a chance on losing my title to a black man" There were challenges to Jeffries from Martin,McVey and Johnson ,he ignored them.

    " Johnson may be good ,he may be able to beat the Japanese Army but I will not fight him "

    Quack !Quack !Quack!