Jack Johnson on Dempsey, Langford, Fitz

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Cmoyle, Oct 31, 2012.


  1. Cmoyle

    Cmoyle Active Member Full Member

    1,284
    14
    Nov 6, 2006
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
  4. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Pounchin powar calculateur Full Member

    2,372
    87
    Sep 13, 2012
    good read, I have come accross some of the lines elsewhere

    I think Johnson is being a bit harsh though, and he does have many reasons to be, good and bad

    Dempsey sometimes used straight punches like a jab or a right cross, he was also a good inside fighter, ripping uppercutts and hooks nicely

    it's true he didn't seem to know how to box, only to fight, but what a fighter he was ! he was fighting inside of his capacity or skill set, and it worked for him most of the time
     
  5. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Pounchin powar calculateur Full Member

    2,372
    87
    Sep 13, 2012
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Lots of truth stymied by more than a little hyperbole.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,195
    Feb 11, 2005
    and people think I'm harsh on Dempsey...

    Lil Arthur is spot on here.
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011

    I couldn't agree more with Johnson.
     
  9. Ricky42791

    Ricky42791 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,884
    15
    Sep 8, 2011
    He's bitter because Dempsey stole his thunder with exiting fights instead of tying everyone up all the time. I'll admit there is some veracity in his analysis but it sounds more like a personal thing then a non-bias theory. Personally I think Jack Dempsey vs Jack Johnson would be a horribly boring fight. Too much clinching kind of like Tyson vs Bone Crusher smith.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,080
    Jun 2, 2006
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,195
    Feb 11, 2005
  12. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Pounchin powar calculateur Full Member

    2,372
    87
    Sep 13, 2012
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,080
    Jun 2, 2006
    I hadn't read your post, still there's no harm done is there?:patsch
     
  14. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Pounchin powar calculateur Full Member

    2,372
    87
    Sep 13, 2012
    I'm bleeding all over the place

    :!:


    :dead
     
  15. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    I recall Jerry Quarry quoted as saying something similar ,from Ring Magazine Sept 2000.


    The article was "Boxing Old-Timers - 'Magical or Mythical'" by Phil Berger



    'Back in '68,heavy-weight contender Jerry Quarry would tell me:"Dempsey's hands were bunched close against his chest.He came straight in at you ,low,with the weave,of course,and the hook started from out to the side of his body-not a quick chop,but a real sidearm swing,which wasted space and wasted time.Sure,he hit hard when he landed.But against the quick,sharp guys around today,Dempsey would be knocked flat on his duff the moment he got halfway into that hook-by a fast move in,and a right hand crossed to his head.
    "And I've seen the rest of them on film... Baer, Carnera, Willard, Firpo, Sharkey... They fought with their hands down,like a bunch of washerwomen. Forget it,Friend.Of the old bunch,the only one who would bother me,mentally,in advance,would be Marciano.The rest I'd figure to take out without much trouble."'



    .....