Jack Johnson v Gene Tunney 15 rounds.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by DonBoxer, Feb 18, 2012.


  1. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    This content is protected


    vs.

    This content is protected


    15 rounds of herkey jerkey boxing.
    But who would you favor?
    :bbb:bbb:bbb
     
  2. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
  3. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    Charlie Sheen by WIDE Decision. :bbb


    I mean Tunney, sorry. :thumbsup
     
  4. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    i like the ring analysis a few years back...tunney steals the early-mid rounds with movement and that delightful jab until johson starts timing him, parrying him and grinds him down down the stretch with that uppercut for a SD 15 (think ring had johnson knocking him out)
     
  5. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,238
    2,434
    Mar 26, 2005
    If Tunney wins a decision it wouldn't surprise me...
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    Seriously, who ever came close to KO'ing Tunney? Dempsey couldn't do it (at least according to the ref) with a flurry of his best punches. Johnson certainly isn't going to do it.

    Over 10 rounds, I certainly favor Tunney. I think his speed of foot gives Johnson real problems as the latter wasn't really that kind of a mover, nor did he seem quick to shut down such by cutting off the ring. Maybe Johnson's roughhousing and infighting win him the late rounds of a 15 round contest and he banks enough earlier rounds to take the decision.

    A bit perplexed on this one.
     
  7. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Agreed.

    It would depend on how much of a lead Tunney builds against Johnson, or how much Johnson wants to fight in the early rounds. I could see a fight with a lot of feinting and feeling out for the first few rounds. Tunney lands the more telling blows early, Johnson gets a lot more serious and closes the gap taking the middle to the late rounds. Tunney wins a clear decisision 10 rounds, a close split in 12 and proably loses in 15 rounds to Johnson by UD. Jack would probably be a bit too playful early and pay the price, especially considering the social demographics of the time on race. Not saying he would ko Tunney, by I wouldn't put it past Johnson to stop Tunney around the 14th round or the last round.
     
  8. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    I think its a good close match up. Tunney takes the early rounds and it just depends how long taking those rounds last for as to the result of the fight. I think i favor him to pull off the UD but either one wouldnt surprise me. I dont see a KO, its going 15.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    LOOK at Tunney on film. He looks better.

    He's smaller, and Johnson was unquestionably very special.

    But I play the board not the man so if these two were in the ring tomorrow i'd pick Tunney. But it'd be a kind of resigned pick - a pick I felt I had to make rather than with any expectations of being right, if that makes sense. A better way to say it, maybe, is I'd pick Tunney but I wouldn't be surprised to be proven wrong.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    What are Johnson's greatest victories? Against Langford when Lil Arthur weighed 185? Against Burns when he was 192? Don't say Jeffries because Ketchell or a dozen other contenders could have whipped him by 1910. Johnson's greatest victories were when he weighed below 200 pounds. Tunney was about 190-192 for his HW fights. Tunney had longer reach, Johnson was an inch taller. Really not much of a difference.
     
  11. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Kind of like on a football accumulator when you think to yourself Aston Villa look good, i fancy Aston Villa this week... ahhh **** it i cannt pick them over Chelsea.
     
  12. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    I rate Johnson higher on the heavyweight scale, but tunney would be a tough matchup.

    Still I think Johnson ekes out a close decision over 15.

    Probably a boring fight though.

    Keith
     
  13. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    Jack Johnson couldn't stop Gene Tunney on the best day he ever saw. The reverse is also true. Both men are durable and neither is a big KO puncher.
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,413
    Jul 15, 2008
    It's a tough call because Johnson seemed to fight in spirits and only enough to win when he felt like it ... I think Johnson was stronger, a harder hitter and just as fast ... however Tunney was fast and active and would fight at a fast pace .. I've never seen JOhnson fight at that sort of pace although reports of his pre-title bouts read that he did when necessary ... Johnson fought much better competition ... I favor him but only if he came to win ... not any of the bs he pulled often ..
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    Highly debatable.

    Who did he fight better than Greb FIVE TIMES, Loughran, Dempsey TWICE, Carpentier and Levinsky?

    The only fighter he fought arguably better than Greb was the one time he fought Langford. And he held a 30 pound weight advantage for that fight!

    McVea, Jeanette, Burns, Jim Johnson and that shell of Jeffries don't compare to even the old Dempsey, let alone Loughran.