Jack Johnson vs Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by johny, Aug 20, 2020.


Who wins

  1. Dempsey Decision

    4.0%
  2. Dempaey Knockout

    44.0%
  3. Johnson Decision

    44.0%
  4. Johnson Knockout

    8.0%
  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,113
    25,279
    Jan 3, 2007
    If Johnson can defensively neutralize Dempsey’s attacks then he can win.
     
    Dance84 likes this.
  2. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    Dempsey outworks the great johnson ....great great fighters !!!
     
    Dance84 likes this.
  3. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,436
    5,623
    Dec 31, 2018
    It’s a saying
     
    Dance84 likes this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Johnson said Dempsey was a great 4 round fighter, and after that he was just ordinary.
     
  5. WAR01

    WAR01 In the 7.2% Full Member

    1,776
    1,540
    Aug 19, 2019
    Lol George flattens everyone on that list bar Ali.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    This content is protected

    • This content is protected
    • This content is protected

    • This content is protected
    This content is protected



    Mendoza says: EXCUSES and omission of data!

    Johnson had 24+ known fights and had been boxing for roughly 7 years when he lost via early Ko to Choynski!

    Griffin was past his best; Johnson still could not beat him in three tries, he only lost and drew

    Kaufman? Hahah. A below-average white hope who was Ko'd by light punching Jack O'brien before. Johnson could not stop him at all. Six other men did. Can you say Johnson lacked power, or will you need to pull some obscure quote. Ko's on paper vs. losing records, mediocre, green or smaller men Johnson often does not have in many cases! Draw your own conclusions

    Ross was a BUM losing 4 of his last 6, then suddenly gets a title shot???. DISGRACE.
    This content is protected
    Wow, a guy with a 24-14-6 ( Ko'd 10 times ) hurt Jack Johnson, in what was called a 6 round world title fight. That does't make Johnson looks good, quite the opposite! A guy like Ross stung Johnson.

    We already know the deal on the Hart fight, Johnson lost it! He did little in the 2nd half.

    Don't you get tired with a losing argument against history?

    Copying what you like from Box Rec again? Before the bout, Referee Eddie Smith announced that he would give no decision if both men were on their feet at the end of the 10 rounds. So it's a ND, or if you must a " news " win, short title fight over Kaufman.
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2020
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Name the24+ fights Johnson had before he faced Choynski?

    I included Kaufman to show Johnson did not fight all small guys.
    You said Johnson did not hurt Hart, actually he gave him a pretty good beating as the fight report, and descriptions of Harts face after the fight show.
    Ross beat
    Ferguson
    Harris
    Palzer
    Flynn
    Gardner
    And drew with
    Jeannette & Shreck

    Kaufman lost to O Brien in his 6th fight
    4 months after being outclassed by Johnson ,Kaufman beat O Brien.TWICE

    Kaufman also beat
    Ross
    Lang
    Flynn
    Shreck
    Gardner
    Their records show they were both better fighters that John Finnegan and Jack Munroe, both of whom received title shots against Jim Jeffries!
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2020
    Dance84 likes this.
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,113
    25,279
    Jan 3, 2007
    Might have worked to Johnson’s advantage
     
    mcvey and Dance84 like this.
  9. Dance84

    Dance84 Unicorn and seastar land Full Member

    8,066
    5,453
    Oct 11, 2017
    Its a tight one
     
    mcvey likes this.
  10. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,879
    Feb 23, 2020
    I think Johnson has too much skill, speed, defense, footwork and strength in the clinches for Dempsey. Johnson's uppercut inside is the perfect antidote to Dempsey's infighting. I think it probably looks a little like this, minus the headbutts

    This content is protected
     
    Dance84 and mcvey like this.
  11. Dance84

    Dance84 Unicorn and seastar land Full Member

    8,066
    5,453
    Oct 11, 2017
    Damn lol its competitive so far lol
     
  12. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,879
    Feb 23, 2020
    I'm objective, I look at which fighter makes the least mistakes and who has the physical advantages. I've gone back and forth on Jack Johnson. I've considered him pre-historic in the past because he's boring and he's a spoiler who fights with low hands, but technically he's solid, except for going back in straight lines, which his footspeed let him get away with. Dempsey's chance is that he catches Johnson going back in a straight line but he was usually hard to catch and got away with this textbook error.

    His use of distance with his footwork, he has fast parrying, clinches for defense and to tire opponents, jab and timing is masterful. On film his opponents could rarely lay a glove on him.

    Dempsey isn't a modern fighter, he doesn't use a jab hardly ever and he leads with power shots. He makes mistakes, which sees him gets countered. Stylistically he struggled against opponents with elite speed, jab, movement and defense. Johnson had all of these in spades

    I don't think Johnson could beat a modern SHW like Lewis, Wlad, Vitali or Fury, he's too small. But in his own era he was nicknamed a giant and a big man of his day.
     
    Seamus and Dance84 like this.
  13. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    I don't think his nickname was used due to his size. He wasn't really that big for his era.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  14. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,879
    Feb 23, 2020
    In terms of the combination of height and muscle mass he was one of the bigger men of his day. Outside of Willard, Kauffman and Denver Ed Martin, he was taller than all his opponents. Jeffries was the bigger man in all of his fights too wasn't he?

    Average height has increased by 11cms in Britain since the 1870s:

    [url]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23896855[/url]
     
    Dance84 likes this.
  15. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Jim McCormick
    Hank Griffin
    Joe Kennedy
    Fred Russell
    Jim Jeffords
    Peter Felix
    Frank Moran
    Arthur Cravan
    Pat Lester
    Bearcat Wright
    were all taller than Johnson too
     
    mcvey and 70sFan865 like this.