Jack Johnson .Vs. John L. Sullivan

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Aug 27, 2008.



  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,046
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am going to say that the four basic styles of boxer, have always been the same, even if variables like stance and guard have changed.
     
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,482
    11,176
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think at some point, though, you're talking about "swarmers" / "boxers" / "punchers" in a different striking art, and it becomes a very loose analogy.

    For example, are we considering Mendoza to be on the spectrum of these styles?
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,046
    Feb 15, 2006
    I provisionally confine my observation to gloved boxing.

    I am not sure how practical it would be to be a swarmer, in an LPR fight for example.

    Once it comes down to three minute rounds, and anything from four to forty five of them, the four basic styles start to assert themselves.
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,458
    May 30, 2019
    How do you view someone like Joe Gans? Do you also think that he's too different from modern style to consider him a boxer puncher?
     
  5. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,952
    Mar 26, 2011
    I would describe him as such.
     
    70sFan865 likes this.
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,046
    Feb 15, 2006
    Or would it be unfair to call battling Nelson a swarmer?
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,482
    11,176
    Jun 30, 2005
    He's more similar to modern boxing than Johnson is. It's a spectrum, but somebody like Johnson is way on the "early" end of that spectrum, IMO.

    Gans / McGovern still doesn't look like a modern fight.
     
  8. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,952
    Mar 26, 2011
    No,I don't think so.
     
  9. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,458
    May 30, 2019
    Counter argument to that is the fact that Johnson haf very unique, self made style that wasn't representative for boxers of his era.
    That's probably because it was a fix :)
     
    Tonto62 likes this.
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,482
    11,176
    Jun 30, 2005
    It was typical of boxers of that era -- from what I can tell -- to assemble oddball styles with some combination of the generic style of Sullivan's time mixed with stuff they picked up on the road. None of the heavyweights of Johnson's cohort or earlier looks normal.

    EDIT: Put another way, the *problem* I see with Jack-Jitsu comes from the fact that unlike modern boxing, which is time tested, Johnson's style is a Frankenstein's monster assembled by a single very smart man from stuff he picked up near the dawn of boxing.

    I only vaguely remember knowing that at one time. Anyway. Feel free to pick whatever fight you consider most representative of his style, then.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2021
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,046
    Feb 15, 2006
    Without weighing in too heavily, there is certainly credible evidence.

    You would do better to watch one of Gans's longer fights.
     
  12. ron davis

    ron davis Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,043
    1,790
    Sep 2, 2013
    Dempsey didn't go by any rules. Jack Sharkey brings to mine. JJ would play with the Great J.L.Sullivan.
     
  13. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    14,959
    12,999
    Jun 9, 2007
  14. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,296
    Mar 20, 2013