Jack Johnson's thoughts on Louis vs. Conn. He makes fun of Louis' stance

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Dec 29, 2011.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Jack Johnson's thoughts on Louis vs. Conn II. He makes fun of Louis' stance. Actually I think his points here are spot on this time.


    [url]http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=aB0sAAAAIBAJ&sjid=58YEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3836,5201779&dq[/url]
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Maybe Louis should've maken fun of Johnson's constant holding, limited and sporadic offence and midget-bashing.
     
  3. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,226
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    Johnson had a whole heap of pride, mixed with jealously of Louis. You get the sense that Johnson wanted to fight Louis, although at age 68 that would be impossible. But you can tell that Johnson thinks that if he was in his prime that he could take Louis.
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    1. Johnson is right in his technical criticisms of Louis and Dempsey's style

    2. The paper claims he had 250 fights
     
  5. gentleman jim

    gentleman jim gentleman jim Full Member

    1,640
    56
    Jan 15, 2010
    Johnson's style was perfect....for the times he fought in. I have a hard time seeing any heavyweight fighter going far in the modern era using that fencer's stance that Johnsosn employed while he was fighting. That style is good for the one shot at a time offense that was prevalent during Johnson's era but would be problematic in later eras where more combination punching, faster paced and less holding boxing became the norm. It might be hard to reach a fighter in that stance but it would be as hard for that fighter to reach his opponent as well...especially if that opponent is taller with a longer reach and mobile ( Mmm..I wonder who fits that style of fighter...Can anybody guess?). A lot of Johnson's criticism of Louis strikes me as sour grapes. He has some legit points but most of it seems to be based on his being jealous of Louis' popularity. Let's be honest...since Johnson how many other HW champs adopted his style of fighting? Right and there's a reason for that. The game changed. Rules, equipment, duration of fights and fan interest and expectations....and of course money. The way Jack fought was perfectly suited for his era. It wouldn't be in future eras.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    Stance has always been the biggest point of contention among fighters of the previous generation criticising the current crop.

    Larry Folley said something similar about Jack Johnson.
     
  7. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,226
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    I like what John L. Sullivan said, which is that each coach will tell you to stand in a certain way and hold your hands in a certain way. He said it was all bosh, that a fighter should do what works for him.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    as true then as now.
     
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    indeed. However, isnt it also possible that a combination puncher can be made reluctant to lead first? that the fencer can feint the faster paced fighter into a trap? styles evolve and equipment changes but some of that fencing and its pace has come back into heavyweight boxing with an albeit different stance. the klitchsco brothers stand off and fence - often using the weighted "back drop" johnson is taliking about. They slow a fighther down and stop them working like old jack did.
     
  10. gentleman jim

    gentleman jim gentleman jim Full Member

    1,640
    56
    Jan 15, 2010
    Good point Choklab...and true, though it would take a certain type of fighter to pull that style of fighting off today. The klitchsco brothers have the height and reach to do it but a smaller HW would need exceptional reflexes and vision to ward off blows from a bigger and equally fast opponent the way Johnson did. It would probably be easier for the average smallish HW to make himself even smaller and slip and counter or bob and weave his way inside rather than try to adopt Johnson's style of fighting. For the record I don't think Jack's style was primitive, just problematic in todays boxing world. I do think that if Jack Johnson was time machined into todays HW division he would be a royal pain in the ass for todays heavies due to his mastery of that style. Now that I think of it, he'd be a royal pain in the ass in any era for that matter.
     
  11. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    :good exactly, a pain in the ass is a pain in the ass whatever the era.
     
  12. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    416
    Sep 25, 2005
    John Conteh used Johnsons stance for much of his career and it worked well since John almost always sat back and countered, but as with Jack if they tried to move quickly forward it was ackward. If you look at films of Jack when he did this it partially works but also looks like his legs are going to cross, its the downside of the stance. I worked on this stance for years and there are a lot of good boxers it will not let one win against, for Johnson later on he would have lost decisions with it also. Joes stance was made to order for quick, perfectly thrown combinations of every punch in the book, something Jack could never do from the weight on the back foot setting.