Jack of All Trades, Master of None

J M Marquez.

 

Lamont Peterson.

 

Good call

 

I was going to say McCallum before someone else did, but he was well rounded with great assets.

 

Buddy McGirt could do everything well. Michael Watson was arguably the best of the Brit Pack of middleweights but had the least flashy set of skills.

 

McCallum , Barrera , Spinks were a master boxers.

This thread is too complex. If you posses every attribute of the game you are in some way a master of boxing.

 

Good Call On Brian Mitchell. I got to him in person get robbed in Sacramento against a good fighter Tony Lopez. The man got a draw in his hometown. Then in the rematch he won even more clearly and got the decision.


Orlando Canizales is one that also comes to mind

 

Steve Robinson
Marcos villisana
Manuel medina
Michael olajide

 

I feel like this category was made for and should be named for Emile Griffith.

Vernon Forrest
Carlos Palomino
Pongsaklek Wongjongkam
Veerapol Sahaprom
Lupe Pintor

 

Marlon starling

 

Brilliant call, Drew but post-Paret fight, primarily. Before that he was a proper banger.

Boxing Illustrated did an article in about 1990 on 'cuties', fighters who could be seemingly overmatched against opponents who were quicker or stronger and yet had enough fundamental skills to win regardless.

The term cutie has morphed from that and now tends to be applied to slicksters but this article made it clear the term should apply to physically overmatched technicians who didn't seem to do anything brilliantly but nothing badly. I can't recall all the fighters but Billly Graham has stuck in my head as an example from the article.

 

Saoul Mamby would be an example of this, I think.

 

Floyd Mayweather jr was extremely complete.

 

Ezzard Charles, M.Spinks, M.Moorer, Tunney, Archie moorer @LHW
SRR,Greb,Willie pep,