Don't worry about me, I'm in the right place. There is nothing to suggest Lamotta will win. Hagler had just as good a chin, was far superior skill wise, and faster. So please tell me how on Earth will Lamotta overcome that ? And for the record, you are roughly my age, so stol patronizing
When you become able to read up on the history of the sport & especially research the careers of the Bull & Marvin, Ask yr Mommy to take you to a big place called a l i b r a r y and once there get an adult to show you the proper stacks.
Spare me the crap. If your opinion is based on some books you've read, then you're dumber than you sound. Give me some proper arguments as to why Lamotta would win, not just some crap you've read in a book. How would the fight go, what does Lamotta bring to the table so that he can ever beat Hagler ? when: Hagler is faster, more skilled offensively, being able to switch from southpaw to orthodox, has just a good of a chin. LaMotta would be nothing more than a sac of potatoes waiting to be battered on, he was easy to hit.
Always so clear cut here Hagler was too skilled! In what way specifically and it what way did those things trouble Jake?
