Jake Paul Phony Fights Discussion

1. You have no clue about any kind of communications between Fury and Paul and what kind of other options are open to Jake Paul - no doubt a lot. But boxing fans always think they're privy. It's kind of cute.

2. It doesn't take much to be a low-level pro like Szpilka, who has beaten nobody in his career. You're seriously kidding yourself. "100 times out of 100" is one of the funniest quotes I've seen in some time. Keep on dreaming, buddy.

 

Naturally - he's pulling in plenty of casual $ right now, which means plenty of people would be happy to take a cut to fight him.

It's telling, then, that he is still yet to fight an actual boxer... And the reason for mentioning Tommy Fury has nothing to do with any actual negotiations and everything to do with him having about as weak a resume as someone can have and still claim to be an actual boxer - yet JP shows zero interest in stepping up to even that pathetic level.

It takes a damn sight more than fighting non-boxers... There are thousands upon thousands of people who wish they could make it to the kind of level where they could beat actual pros with any kind of winning record - Jake Paul makes loads of money, but he hasn't done jack **** as a "boxer".

100 times out of 100 is cold, hard realism.

Sorry "buddy"

 

you have very deluded percpection what skill level of fighters who can win International title of major organization are. They are no means low level boxer and versus guys like that Jake Paul would be taken out easily. He would be lucky to land clean shot

 

Hate to say it but Jake, novice and total affront to boxing's integrity that he is, would demolish both Różański and Szpilka in 1rd. Rozanski because he's a terrible boxer with a poor chin and zero defense, and Szpilka because he's a decent boxer with a glass chin and poor defense.

 

7-5 7 KO wins, 5 KO losses. The perfect glass cannon.

 

This content is protected

 

Changed my vote after watching that. Jake Paul by flying lucky dip kick

 

This has to be a joke right ?

 

Right. One punch on Szpilka and it's over.

Parroting this repeatedly won't solve your state of dissonance.

 

Claiming Jake Paul beats Artur Szpilka might be one of the stupidest things i have ever seen you type on this forum. Not the stupidest thing though because this is Safin we're talking about, but it's up there

Whats next ? You think Lawrence Okolie KOs prime Holyfield ? Oh wait... The possibilities are endless LOL

 

And whats that supposed to mean ? I don't agree whatsoever just because he said it though i have more respect for him because he's a good poster. Paper chin Artur Szpilka would destroy Jake Paul it's not even funny

 

Can those who think Jake paul would beat a professional boxer please advise me why? Assuming the pro boxer isn't just being paid to take a dive for money, if they're in it for the win, Jake has shown nothing that would prove he's a threat to anyone on that level.

Who has Jake fought? Deji? A basketball player? A fat, out of shape wrestler in Askren who didn't even care?

 

As usual, you resort to the ad-hominem as perfectly illustrated by the abovementioned post.

"It's ok for him to convey the same message as what I've described as one of the most stupid posts in your stupid posting history because he's a good member".

I don't sit on the fence, and I definitely don't pander to blokes like yourself who are uneducated and mentally challenged.

 

You act like being a top 100 professional cruiserweight/heavyweight is the same as being a top 100 golfer or tennis player.

Low level cruiserweights and heavyweights are generally unskilled and only there because they are big enough and have no other options in life. Szpilka has beaten nobody apart from one old man and a bunch of part-timers who make most of their living driving taxis.

Just because Jake Paul does have other options does not mean that he doesn't have a sufficient degree of skill to beat Szpilka, which is not very high as we have just witnessed yet again.