Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Apr 3, 2021.
Hes being writen off because personal preference, not because of his skills imo.
How can you beat me, when you're incessantly dropping out and I stay until the end? Regardless, I'm ranked fairly high this year, because I'm taking less risks and playing sensibly. But fine, whatever, name the matches, I'll destroy you. Because pride and bragging rights are on the line, which means you get nothing but logic, with zero emotion. Which is the worst possible version of me to go against.
The first 3 years i ranked higher than you, i predicted the first draw ever in the league, had i not taken the year and a half off hiatus id be ranked above you ALL TIME too, and you know it. Sorry i cant be home all day moderating this site the way you do. I have responsiblities, but like i said lets do a best out of 5, mano y mano. You pick the 5 matches, and well agree to disagree on them. Canelo vs Saunders will definitely be on the list. Youre opinion of yourself on here often destroys you, now i get to make a point.
Say what you want about the mcguigans but Frampton has never looked the same he left them. This was sad to see. He looked fleshy & shot. Mcguigans training regimes were brutal apparently but they obviously did him some good. Moore was awful here too, poor instructions & poor conditioning of his fighter. Carl you should have retired after Warrington. A fighter that is constantly talking about retirement et cetera is never in a good place in the sport in my opinion and Frampton has been talking about it for years.
No, my compulsion to take risks, because I'm an adrenaline junkie and stubbornness and loyalty to certain fighters is what gets the best of me. Haven't you figured that out yet?
Alvarez MD will be my official pick. Shall we even continue?
Nice, go back off all the BS, all the numerous insane claims youve made over the years because ur ballsack is tucked in your stomach. Ok tho, i got Canelo by stoppage.
What insane claims? That Saunders will do enough to make it really competitive and arguably win enough rounds to nick it, and get shafted, because all close rounds go to Canelo? That's actually the common sense position to take. Remember what happened the last time a guy fought southpaw against Canelo? Jacobs arguably won 4 to 5 of the last 6 rounds of the fight, as a southpaw. Canelo still has an issue with them whether you admit it or not.
I’m sure the drinks are flowing in the McGuigan household.
You always say that, and most of the times youre flat out wrong. Lol ive never said Canelo didnt have issues with southpaws, but that was then and this is now. Canelo has improved immensely over the years since the trout and Lara days, what makes you think that he hasnt? And why do you say arguably, jacobs won those rounds. Just say he won them, but he didnt. What was your scorecard for Canelo vs Jacobs, im dying to hear it.
Because he looked fairly bad at times against Jacobs for the last 6 rounds of their fight when Jacobs fought predominantly as a southpaw, and Jacobs is far from a natural southpaw, he fights like an orthodox fighter fighting as a southpaw, his stance isn't nearly as advantageous to him as Saunders.
Well thats obvious, saunders is a slick southpaw, but his conditioning is always a question, we know Canelo is going to hit that body hard, and often and as bad as his body has looked over his last couple of fights, i think canelo will stop him to the body. Now 4 more matches to go.
I thought Carl would go down late but man he took some hard shots
You missing the point bro—-He is a slick and dangerous southpaw and Canelo never figures out a plan until midways with a regular SP
I think it'll be very hard for Canelo to land clean on his body enough to do that level of damage, and yeah, his condition is questionable, when he doesn't need top notch conditioning, in the one match he needed it in, against Lemieux, it was excellent.