James Broad v Joe Jeanette

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jun 4, 2010.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,507
    46,056
    Feb 11, 2005
    Let's see.... Jeanette was tiny, possessed of a science that impressed the neanderthals (similar to showing a dog a card trick) and lost his share of fights early on. He had a streak where he was decent against the various plodders and non-athletes of the day. Fought a lot of the same bums over and over again, a feat for which we are told to be in awe. Kudo's for him for being decent in a nascent and relatively horrible era.

    Broad Axe. Made of science. An athlete through and through. Unmotivated and lackadasical. Underacheiver. KO'd Bonecrusher. A promising product of a great era.

    Broad KO5 Jeanette.

    What thinks you?
     
  2. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rYaZ2T0yYk[/ame]
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,507
    46,056
    Feb 11, 2005
  4. Doc Dynamo

    Doc Dynamo Member Full Member

    232
    2
    Mar 12, 2010
    I like Jeannette to win the fight.

    I like Broad to win the pie eating contest.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,571
    27,215
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that you probably assume that the pyramids were built by aliens because the primitive people of the time could never have mastered the complex mathamatical principles involved.
     
  6. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    I think you're selling Jeanette short. He was alot better than you give him credit for and I'd pick him to win this fight.
     
  7. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    :thumbsup
     
  8. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    This was as prime as Broad ever got. Unbeaten, 25 years old, in his best ever shape (still not exactly great shape though).

    Jeannette weighed about the same amount as Frazier.

    198 lb Jeannette vs 215 lb Sandy Ferguson:

    "Jeannette worked the big man's body, hurting him there in the third, and having him reeling in the sixth and seventh. In the eighth round, Ferguson collapsed from the accumulated punishment and his corner threw in the sponge."

    Sounds a lot like the Frazier-Broad fight.
     
  9. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    Jeanette would decision Broad, avoid his power, and render him helpless.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,507
    46,056
    Feb 11, 2005
    At 27 years old, Jeannette weighed 185.

    So the burden of doubt here seems to be on Broad, of whom we much footage both as an excellent amateur and a lazy-ish though sometimes excellent pro.

    Jeanette we essentially have nothing of, certainly during his prime, except the heresay of observers who doubtfully ever saw a modern boxer, and if they did, did so in their advanced age. Not a great witness pool by any standards.

    It appears the real arbiter in these match-ups is the overactive, and provenly biased. imaginations of those who think it possible to render an accurate prediction.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,965
    48,027
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm picking Jeanette by stoppage in round 4.
     
  12. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    The real question here is whether a prime James Broad can beat a 70 year old Jeannette.
     
  13. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    You guys get trolled way too easy
     
  14. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    It's a somewhat legitimate topic in my opinion, even if Seamus is not being entirely serious. I'm well aware that I'd probably get laughed at if I said to the average boxing fan that a 190 lb boxer from the early 1900's would beat a 230 lb boxer from the 1980's.
     
  15. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    I didn't have the impression was being too serious after reading that. Seems like nothing but pure "trying to get people pissed off" trolling.