James Degale has the potential to be our best ever.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Dec 17, 2010.


  1. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    In my opinion.

    Having rewatched the smith fight, Degale looked even better.

    He was in control from start to finish, and a number of the smith "punches" that sky called were actually missed or hit gloves or shoulder.

    Degale is extrodanary defensivley, and his offensive game is really coming on nicely.

    Any fighter who is unable to make adjustments (froch, abraham, dirrell, kessler) is going to have huge problems with degale.
     
  2. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    big statement......

    i'll disagree for the time being tho, feel his power is lacking abit, altho for a 9 fight ''novice'' he is abit special
     
  3. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    4
    Oct 21, 2008
    Brilliant Display. A long way to go but the development in him has been really good. He still needs to sort his punch form out but i'm really impressed by his work.

    Let's face it he never even got out of first gear and when he did he got the stoppage even though it was rather soft he did all he needed to do.

    I think he's more mature then people think, i believe he wants it enough to go as far as he wants.
     
  4. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    ****ing hell...
     
  5. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I think people are underrating smith in terms of the performance.

    I think smith gives a lot of top guys at 168 a tougher time than degale had (by which i mean any kind of resistance at all)

    I just think Degale's talent level is off the page, agree he needs to learn to sit down on the shots at specific times, and a little tightening up here and there, but that all comes with experiance.
     
  6. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    FFS calm down. He beat Paul Smith not Randy Turpin. If you look at the threads from before the fight there was NO ONE (except avid) picking Smith to win. He did what was expected, beat up a guy who wasn't all that. He is a very promising prospect. Im sure he would stop Groves in 6 rounds but to say he would be Britains best yet is crazy.
     
  7. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I said he has the potential.

    look at every other big name brit at the same stage, you have to say Degale compares favorably.
     
  8. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    + 1

    This is a General Forum kneejerk-type reaction to one fight.

    If he looks below average in his next fight the same posters who are licking his balls now will be calling him an overrated bum.
     
  9. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    4
    Oct 21, 2008
    I don't agree with all this he needs more power stuff. He won't be the only guy who doesn't really bang that hard at world class level to win a title or two. Unless were talking about bigger things.

    I think he will learn to sit on punches the more he goes on. His body is developing into a real professional athlete everytime i see him.

    We mostly expected him to win but it's the way he won which is impressive. He handled a guy with sheer ease. The big thing now is his next fight and to see more of his development.

    The BN Front Page this week said something like ''has DeGale already outgrown British Opponents?''....it's kinda true...only Groves or Magee are viable and worthwhile fights and i'd see him splatting George for fun and beating Magee in a good solid learning fight.
     
  10. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010

    Nope, i for one won't be.

    In fact i think it's quite possible James will be moved too fast and come a cropper in his next one, but im sticking to my guns, im saying he's a belt holder in 18 months at most, and I think he goes on to greater things.
     
  11. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    I'm not disagreeing with the impressiveness of the performance against Smith, or with peoples views that he is a potential world champion, or even with those that say he is the hottest prospect in world boxing (see other thread).

    But to say, at this point, that he has the potential to be the best ever British fighter is pretty ridiculous.

    You need to leave it a few more years before attempting to make that kind of call.
     
  12. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    8
    Dec 5, 2006
  13. nickythekid

    nickythekid Active Member Full Member

    780
    0
    Apr 11, 2009
    better than jimmy wilde, kid lewis, kid berg, jim driscoll....really, afier beating paul smith in impressive fashion. degale was an olympic gold medalist with **** knows how much experience. hes got all the right moves but the best ever will never be bettered by the standards of today. im not convinced by him yet. also i think its unfair to say that froch is the kind of fighter who cant adapt. i feel he has the attributes to compete in any era. degales durability hasnt been proven yet along with other things
     
  14. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I don't feel Froch is adaptable really, other than the pascall fight where he switched to jabbing and brawling.

    Against Dirrell and Kessler i thought he lost those fights because he couldnt adapt. Against Taylor he nearly lost for the same reason.

    He couldnt figure out away to deal with Dirrells running and in the Kessler fight he couldnt figure out Kessler after he switched gears.

    In the Abraham fight he didnt need to adapt because his plan worked from start to finish.

    I'm a big fan of Froch but imo he isnt adaptable
     
  15. teddybaldock

    teddybaldock Active Member Full Member

    990
    867
    Oct 18, 2010