James J Corbett v.s Bob Fitzsimmons

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bad_Intentions, Jul 18, 2007.


  1. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    30
    May 15, 2007
    london prize ring rules. (bareknuckles)

    who wins?
     
    Bad_Intentions, Jul 18, 2007
    Bad_Intentions, Jul 18, 2007
    #1
  2. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,176
    1,457
    Sep 13, 2006
    Bob Fitzsimmons.
     
    apollack, Jul 18, 2007
    apollack, Jul 18, 2007
    #2
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,455
    12,761
    Jun 30, 2005
    It would be rather similar to their actual fight, except that the knuckles would be a tad more vulnerable. Fitz is the better infighter, and much would hinge on how well each adapted to wrestling.

    Corbett may have a slightly better chance (cuts), but I'd still go with Fitzy here.
     
    cross_trainer, Jul 18, 2007
    cross_trainer, Jul 18, 2007
    #3
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,144
    Oct 22, 2006
    If Corbett can get a draw with Jackson under London prize (with gloves) then he can beat Fitzsimmons...

    Corbett KO40
     
    TBooze, Jul 18, 2007
    TBooze, Jul 18, 2007
    #4
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,829
    14,575
    Jun 9, 2007
    Fitz
     
    robert ungurean, Jul 18, 2007
    robert ungurean, Jul 18, 2007
    #5
  6. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,455
    12,761
    Jun 30, 2005
    On the other hand, Corbett is going to get much longer to recover if he's knocked down, and a better start-stop rhythm. He will also be able to drop when tired or hurt.

    Still, Fitz's energy conserving style will be an issue here.
     
    cross_trainer, Jul 18, 2007
    cross_trainer, Jul 18, 2007
    #6