Such an excellent non-sequitur. Thank you. Kirkland has a bad style for Sergio in my opinion, especially if he implements that excellent jab he showed.
Thanks for saying pretty much nothing. Excellent breakdown...:roll: So, what exactly does Kirkland bring that Martinez hasn't seen already, at least from Williams? What is it in Kirkland's style that brings you to that conclusion?
Kirkland has no defense and a glass jaw. Bad style match-up against Martinez and any other top fighter.
That's a rather disturbing picture to tell you the truth...two grown ass greazzy looking hispanic men with their greazzy smile caressin' a young prepubescent american girl... I hope Kirkland knock him the fck out just for that and not just walk away especially if he's pullin' a Sandusky.
Already said why I thought Kirkland would be game, time to start reading. Kirkland has the ability to bring Sergio things that trouble him, mainly a solid jab, constant pressure with the ability to cut off the ring, and very hard punching that can seriously hurt him. To top it off him being a fellow lefty can negate the southpaw advantage he has over his usually comp, who have problems picking up his overhand left. Kirkland has a spotty defense, but it has improved greatly. We will see how Kirkland does against top fighters though when he faces them.
Goddamn, that's some serious libel against Sergio to be spouting off. You shouldn't be tossing **** out like that, ain't cool.
Kirkland does not have a solid jab. It's alright. Nothing major. Besides, look at the last guy martinez fought who actually HAD a solid jab, Dzinzurik. He was OUT jabbed big time by Martinez. You just say generalizations that SOUND good enough to be true. Typical message board expert. Vague and broad! :thumbsup
Solid implies it is good, not exceptional. Barker's jab kept Sergio in check most of their fight. Funny how you ignore that. You've said nothing yourself typical butt hurt fanboy, mad because someone doesn't support your favorite boxer.
I am a big Kirkland fan *******. Unlike you, I was watching Kirkland before he went to jail. And BTW, Barker's jab and Kirkland's jab are not even equal, so your post is highly flawed to start. So why should I give that aspect so much weight? :huh You're now taking the fanboy cop out here. You've essentially just made vague 'boxing sounding' comments and think you gave a proper breakdown. guess what dip****, you didn't. :roll: