James "what does it mean to you if you win" helder

because he is a bedroom journalist that's why

 

Have to agree. He's asked Tyson, Peter and John Fury that question every day since Monday. I appreciate what the guys at IFL do, but James Helder struggles desperately as the guy asking questions. Time for him to take a back seat unfortunately.

 

Bore off will you pointless thread

 

Leave him he's a good kid

 

Better than bounce, bum Jones and the rest of the Brady bunch on box nation

 

At least James does his job and isn't biased. Unlike Kugan who either say's "erm" (secret scouser?) every 10 seconds or is like a little girl at a Westlife concert when he's around Booth and Hearn.

James does his job, and for me, he does it well.

He's the only pro on that team.

 

James is much more real and comes across more objective than Kugan.

Every time Kugan interviews Eddie & AJ you know he's singing from the Matchroom hymn sheet.

 

100% Spot on. :good

I can't recall him being neutral in a long time.

 

Is Kugan not actually on Eddie's payroll? If he's not he needs to have a long hard look at himself.

A few people have mentioned Bunce on here as if being better than him means something. I can't think of a worse 'pundit' ever than him. Total, total buffoon.

 

I thoroughly agree, mate. :good

 

So you are moaning about him for asking a typical question that is asked by every interviewer? Its just a general question, it does mean more to some than it does others.

 

James is decent interviewer- the coverage that iFL provides is usually excellent and free.

 

Nice guy, thick as pig **** and his interviews are appalling.