Who would really want to fight someone that can't lose on the cards? Janibek is obviously going for the ko. Golovkin is in that situation now.
Of course he is for Janibek, Charlo has always had southpaw problems, he lost to Trout and Korobov, but had the ever handy Haymon Protection Services in his corner in both outings. But Janibek is slicker than Korobov and heavier handed than both Matvey an Trout. There's a reason why he scared the booboo out of Boo Boo enough to cause him to shamelessly and blatantly duck him..
Come on Trout didn't win nothing, he talked allot but did he ever deliver in any of his fights? he underachieved if anything.
Most people scored the match for Trout on here. I scored it 117-111, it's seen as one of the more egregious "wins" on the Jermall's ledger. Jermell, who also got a gift against Trout, even performed more impressively against Austin than Jermall did.
Jermell did beat him worse so how can you call that a gift? Trout's never fought to win he just banks out.
Easy, 117-111 against Jermall, 114-113 against Jermell. I don't care if he boxed to win or not. He landed more than either of them did in both matches. There's a reason why one of them was an MD and the other was a point away from being an MD, and no.... Haymon has never been one to do favors for Austin.
Trout was never Haymon's top priority from the beginning due to his Pecking order, Plus i'm sure Haymon like myself knew Trout would never be able to rise to the occasion as with most Boxer's barring the Special kind its easy to tell right of the bat, so no surprise.
Exactly, which is why one match being a MD and the other coming precariously close to being one, backs up my position. Because Trout did rise to the occasion, not once but twice.
There's other way closer fight's eligible for a Re-watch but these two here aren't the ones worth going back to.
I don't care if he was or wasn't. He did enough to beat both Charlos. Check the RBR's on the site. This isn't just some outlandish take from me.