Jarrell Miller on Wilder: 'he performs at a mediocre level against mediocre fighters'

Yet the UK has the most paper champs of all time. Gotta credit Hearn though, hate him all you want but he's a great promoter for his fighters.

 

Miller is an idiot, but what he's saying is correct: If Wilder was any good he would blow away mediocre opposition, not go life and death with them.

 

i'm hoping you don't truly think everyone on that list is better than lewis. we have firsthand knowledge bowe, tyson, and holyfield aren't.

 

you can say that about fury too.

 

I took it as him putting Lewis 2nd on his list. Which is asinine anyway because Louis should be 1st and Ali #2, or Louis should be #2 at the very least if you like to give credit to Ali for losing more in his era than pulling an upset.

 

Ok but Fury has a win over Wlad. I woudln't be ripping Wilder if he beat Wlad.

 

granted, but aside from that his resume is horrible.

 

Fury appears crazy and all, but less fabricated than Wilder to me. Wilder's career seems carefully planned, manufactured. They KNOW he's vulnerable and do not want to take any risk whatsoever. Fury seems less concerned (or just more naive), for all I thought he would get brutally knocked out by Wlad.

 

bowe stunk, nothing on his resume except holyfield. holyfield went .500 or worse against top flight fighters. prime tyson probably decapitates him.

 

bowe thought it was a given. he pulled one of the most cowardly acts in boxing history. while in his prime, btw. like i said, holyfield went .500 or worse against every top flight hw he faced. aside from shot tyson, and fat mid forties foreman, holyfield is waaaay overrated.

 

bowe had to fight dirty to beat pierre coetzer. well, didn't have to, but did because he couldn't stop him any other way.