Jean Pascal vs. Bernard Hopkins & undercard RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Dec 18, 2010.


  1. David B

    David B Nazi Russia lies. This is the only truth. Full Member

    39,142
    109,995
    Feb 25, 2006

    who's that in your avatar?

    :admin
     
  2. zte89147

    zte89147 New Member Full Member

    26
    0
    Dec 3, 2010
    Obviously you didnt watch the same fight as I did
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    That's a self-fulfilling prophecy if I've ever seen one.
     
  4. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Where was the robbery ? Pascal had 2 KD's the middle rounds were close and messy,and Pascal won the last.Pretty much your usual BHop fight,only he was on the wrong end of the decision.Thats Life
     
  5. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    i had it the same way. i thought one of the rounds could have gone to pascal JUST because they were in montreal, but i thought hopkins won the rest pretty clearly. what a joke.
     
  6. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    we already know you're completely biased, but 2 KD's in the MIDDLE rounds?? wtf is that? KD's were in rounds 1 and 3 and one of them shouldn't have even been called a KD. pascal won rounds 1-3 and that was it. he was gassed by round 7, and bernard was fresh the entire fight controlling every aspect of the fight and landing much more and much cleaner.
     
  7. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009

    Your round 10 and 12 is the most ******ed scoring i've ever seen. As ****** as the judge's scores.
     
  8. Wiirdo

    Wiirdo Boxing Addict banned

    4,486
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    Agreed. It seems like you're giving Pascal the benefit of the doubt there every round.
     
  9. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    There was only one Canadian judge.
     
  10. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    10-10 is good for round 2, absolutely **** all happened.

    Pascal deserved one of the last two with his work rate. The only round is round 10 where Hopkins maybe should've got the nod, but it really doesn't matter does it, I know Hopkins deserved the win, but he was not robbed like everyone is saying.
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Ya, but he needed them in order to make his Draw prediction plausible!
     
  12. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    One of the most whimsical defenses of a scorecard I've ever seen.
     
  13. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009

    Tarver had Pascal winning 114-112 and also gave the last to Pascal where Hopkins was more trying to put on a show than win the round. Hopkins deserved to win the fight if anybody but we score a fight on points not by how it appears.
     
  14. rainmaker

    rainmaker Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,218
    0
    Dec 15, 2009
    Come now, there were a few close middle rounds, as well as those 2 KDs. It's not inconceivable that the judges reach a draw at the end. Even the judge that had hopkins winning was just by a round, so you see a close fight and that was an American judge, and he still had it close. Pascal has a case for winning the 12th and maybe a couple others in the middle. I knew it was going to be very close at the end and wasn't sure who came out on top.

    Close fight, but robbery it was not. If Hopkins had won it I would not have argued. I could see a close win for Pascal, close win for B-hop or a draw. It was THAT kinda fight.
     
  15. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    My draw prediction?

    Are you assuming I predicted the draw in round 9 or w/e when I first mentioned it on this thread?

    Take a look at the betting thread from 3-4 days ago :lol::patsch