Jeff Chandler vs Leo Randolph

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Titan1, Jul 11, 2007.


  1. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,557
    Oct 18, 2004
    If Jeff had fought Leo at 122 in a 15 rounder, could he possibly take the decision?
     
  2. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    288
    Apr 18, 2007
    No question. Randolph was a good little boxer, with an excellent jab, and he came off the deck to outjab and TKO the much taller Ricardo Cardona in 15. (Inside a 14 foot ring!) But Jeff Chandler is a true HOFer, and as great an amateur as Leo was, he wasn't really in Jeff's league as a pro.

    (They both deserve acclaim for walking away from boxing when they did, and became champions at the perfect time for American boxers at that weight to reach the top. Also noteworthy, because they may have been the only two champions in boxing at the time with cornerwomen.)
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,071
    Apr 27, 2005
    Chandler's kicking butt in this one, i class him in the "Great" category.
     
  4. tommy the hat

    tommy the hat Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    9
    Sep 2, 2008
    Jeff Chandler would win. Leo Randolph was an incredible talent who won a gold medal in Montreal at only 17. But he had other interests besides boxing. He didn't even have interest in turning pro, he wanted to be a truck driver. He had to have his arm twisted and be convinced to fight pro. He did win a title, and after he lost it in his first defense, he retired for good at 22. Could have achieved the things Chandler did as a pro, but wanted to do other things in his life.
    Chandler on the other hand was a hungry, dominant champion who ended up in the IBHOF. This is why I pick him in this one.
     
  5. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    81
    Jul 9, 2008
    Agreed with all. Chandler was a notch up from Randolph (as a pro).