Jeff fenech vs brian mitchell

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr Butt, Oct 18, 2014.


  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Fenech fought Nelson for the first time in 1991 and I think mitchell fought Lopez for the second time in 1991 . Let's replace Nelson with mitchell who wins this super-featherweight great clash

    The first Nelson fight was really fenech's last top level performance and the second mitchell/Lopez contest was Mitchell's last defence before his first retirement. So each would be in pretty good nick if this contest had happened in 91


    12 rounds at super-featherweight
     
  2. Germanicus

    Germanicus Active Member Full Member

    977
    9
    Nov 13, 2013
    Mitchell wins, he's the naturally bigger man. Fenech was at his best at the lower weight classes.
     
    oldcanvasback and lloydturnip like this.
  3. grumpy old man

    grumpy old man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    6
    Jun 1, 2014
    Fenech was at his best in lower divisions. But he was an inch and a half taller than Mitchell, and the version of Fenech unluckly not to get the points in Vegas was close to prime.

    Granted by 1991 Mitchell hadn't lost in 10 years. But this would have potentially been a great fight.
     
  4. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    The Fenech that battled a still-formidable Nelson to a standstill* would have been a formidable opponent for Mitchell.
    Mitchell's interesting because while his competition generally wasn't that great, he stepped up his game when the comp. got tougher. He liked aggressive fighters that came to him, and usually it was the cuties and movers that made him look bad.

    I never saw anyone out-tough Mitchell. That said, Fenech was a fantastically conditioned athlete with a dependable beard and excellent workrate. I think their intangible and tangible strengths match up pretty well. Both were very confident, determined fighters.
    Mitchell I'd say was the more versatile, Fenech the more relentless.

    Over 15 this would be a humdinger. I may favour Mitchell simply because he's a lot more proven at 130. Great fight.

    *Fenech deserved the verdict, imo.
     
    oldcanvasback, BCS8 and haNZAgod like this.
  5. grumpy old man

    grumpy old man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    6
    Jun 1, 2014
    Good post :good
     
    oldcanvasback likes this.
  6. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,425
    12,849
    Feb 2, 2006
    The more I watch Mitchell the more I come to see just how vastly underrated he was-he could do everything.
    I would pick Mitchell to beat Fenech because at some point in the bout Mitchell would figure what would work against Fenech.
    Mitchell just reminds me of the throwback fighters of years ago who didn't rely on natural speed/reflexs but just learned his craft the hard way and could do a little of everything-really liked watching Mitchell vs Beard 2.
     
    lloydturnip and BCS8 like this.
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,327
    9,934
    Jun 23, 2008
    Mitchell would have outclassed Fenech.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  8. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,213
    15,237
    Jun 9, 2007
    Fenech of the first Nelson fight wins IMO. Fenechs quality of opposition was of a higher calibre
     
    PhillyPhan69 and young griffo like this.
  9. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,489
    7,238
    May 18, 2006
    I'd go with Fenech.

    His decline was one of the more rapid ones I've seen but up until and including the first Nelson fight he was awesome. Mitchell wasn't better than Nelson and Fenech gave Azumah hell in that first fight and clearly won in my view.

    Mitchell was a very good fighter and while naturally larger I doubt he was physically stronger than Jeff nor could he match the workrate Jeff always, always brought. It would be a good, tight contest but the Fenech of the Martnez and Villasana fights was too good for Mitchell in my view.
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,511
    80,735
    Aug 21, 2012
    Vote for Mitchell.

    He liked aggressive fighters and he was just so clever in the ring. He was able to adjust on the fly and typically by the end rounds if his superb conditioning hadn't won it for him, he had figured out the other guy and was picking the dude apart.
     
    young griffo likes this.
  11. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,828
    6,589
    Dec 10, 2014
    Fenech by decision
     
  12. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,828
    6,589
    Dec 10, 2014
    French was a few levels above Tony Lopez.

    Lopez was by far Mitchells toughest opponent.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2019
  13. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,828
    6,589
    Dec 10, 2014
    Great post
     
    young griffo likes this.
  14. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    1,654
    Sep 5, 2016
    Mitchell on points or late stoppage .Very underrated fighter works Fenech out picking him apart as he attacks.
     
  15. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,095
    15,563
    Dec 20, 2006
    I pick Fenech, but my would this be fun. Fenech would come forward and Mitchell liked guys that did. But I don’t think he would enjoy the non stop pressure as much as he did with a slower less relentless stalker ala Lopez. I think Fenech wins the day in an exciting close decision
     
    young griffo and robert ungurean like this.