Jeff Lacy. The myth. And why Calzaghe is WAY short of being a legend.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lionel Rose, Aug 19, 2009.


  1. Maelstrom

    Maelstrom Guest

    Solid fighter..yes...excellent skills:patsch:lol:

    C'mon now.
     
  2. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah,thats surprising given Warrens record.
    When you have a golden goose,you must "feed it correctly" to keep producing for you.:good
     
  3. O.k., here is my contention:

    Joe C is a good, not great fighter. His best win, IMO, is Kessler. In order to be considered a great fighter in my eyes, you need to beat other great fighters in their primes Joe simply hasn't done that. Kessler is Joe's best win, but I don't consider Kessler a great fighter by any means. Moving on...

    Joe's other good wins include: Bernard Hopkins-Hop was 43, and a former shade of himself, but it's still a good win. But, I was unimpressed with how Joe went about getting that win. It was pretty obvious Bernard didn't have much fight in him in that night. If Joe was so great, he would've handled Bernard more easily. Joe didn't make the adjustments in that fight to make it easier for him and that's what a great fighter would've been able to do. Looking less than impressive against an old Hopkins leaves much to be desired.


    Jeff Lacy- Jeff was not some kind of great champion. Who did Jeff beat to get his titles? Syd Vanderpool for the IBF strap. Does anyone consider Syd to be a great fighter? I didn't think so. And, Lacy earned the IBO Belt from a washed-up Reid. So, those were Lacy's biggest wins going into the Calzaghe fight-hardly screams out great fighter. Jeff may have been in his prime, but I do not consider him to be worthy of people saying this is a "great" win on Joe's resume. It simply does not compute. Lacy was also getting served by Wiggins back in 2003. I knew what he was back then.

    Robin Reid- I admit, I've never seen this fight. However, I've heard on more than one ocassion that it was a gift decision for Joe. But, it's a win, and you have to give Joe credit for that. It's not a great win however. Why? Because Reid was not a great fighter IMO.


    Chris Eubank- Ah, "Simply The Best'. It sure was fun watching this guy fight when he was in his prime. Too bad the Joe C. fight wasn't one of those "prime" fights, because Chris would've KO'd Joe no questions asked. Some say, "Well, Eubank was only 31 when they fought". Well, my response to that is, Eubank turned pro when he was 19 and Joe C was his 50th pro fight. I think it's safe to say Eubank wasn't in his prime when he fought Joe. Was Eubank a great fighter? Yes, but not when he fought Joe he wasn't. He was past it, and I don't think that's something that can really be argued.



    Moving along...


    Joe captured the WBO belt in 97 yet didn't capture another belt for 10 years. Why is that? No, seriously, why is that? I would like some answers as to why Joe never challenged Frankie Liles in '96 or '97 for his WBA crown. That was a fight that should've been made yet it never came to fruition. My guess is, Joe didn't want none. He knew he would get outboxed by the southpaw Liles.

    Also, why did Joe C never get it on with RJJ, the best boxer of the 90's arguably? Could it be that Joe and his camp knew Joe would get outclassed? Joe had plenty of time to try and capture Jones' IBF strap yet it never happened. Once again, I believe this fight never got made because Joe knew he would lose. It's much safer to fight Omar Sheika, I get it.

    And, what about the Supermiddle WBC belt in the mid-to-late 90's and even in the new millenium. Why did Joe never challenge for it until Kessler? That belt changed hands so many times I couldn't even count. Was Joe afraid to fight Thulani Malinga and Richie Woodhall??? I'm just really stumped as to why Joe never went after the WBC belt before the Kessler fight. It doesn't make sense to me why a "supposed" great fighter would not challenge himself but rather fight in his own backyard for most of his career and choose to defend his WBO belt a million times. All those title defenses mean very little to me because he simply didn't fight the other best supermiddleweight fighters during this time. Instead, he chose the tomato route.
     
  4. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    Calzaghe is a great fighter.

    NOT because of Lacy. Lacy is not and never was anything spectacular. In fact Lacy never at any point in his career beat a true top 10 fighter. The closest is Tsypko or even Manfredo and both came AFTER the Calzaghe fight. However, all in all - Lacy is a gatekeeper at best.

    Lacy should not be used to embellish Joe's resume - nor should it be used to belittle his resume. Joe has a great resume but it has nothing to do with Lacy.
     
  5. ChrisKim47

    ChrisKim47 Active Member Full Member

    1,246
    0
    May 22, 2009
    Joe Calzaghe ducked every fighter who had a chance at beating him and only fought tomato cans in his backyard. What else needs to be said about the Sloppy One?
     
  6. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,946
    2,699
    Apr 17, 2009
  7. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    25
    Feb 16, 2006
    None of the above.He was a rising prospect ruined by a bad loss and an injury.
     
  8. DanielSt

    DanielSt 46-0-0 Full Member

    304
    0
    Aug 19, 2009
    Calzaghe is a brilliant fighter, who beat the best fighters at smw of his time and also won vs american boxers roy jones, hopkins, lacy, manfredo, mitchell and brewer.

    He retired Undefeated with 46-0-0 and is top 15 p4p of all time.
     
  9. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009

    Great post. Quite correct and clear to everyone who was there to watch all of the fighters from the 70s to the present. There are only about a dozen guys on all of ESB that know their head from their ass IMO (so how did I miss your posts?).

    Joe got off to a good start (first four) and then struggled landing little while catching but shaking off punches with his face for the last eight rounds against an old worn exhausted Eubank. Joe didn't win that fight in any sense except he was younger and fresher and his work rate covered up his sloppy lack of clean punches landed and his chin just held up as he had never seen a decent fighter up until that fight (and wouldn't again for a long time) and he just toughed it out (as he couldn't figure out how to stop himself from walking into the same right hand again and again) and absorbed Chris' intermittent punches and was only finally rocked and holding on as the seconds ticked down as the 12th ended. If Chris had landed just a little earlier Joe might not have seen the bell in the 12th. That fight should have been called a draw.

    Frankie Liles was on a higher level than Joe. If Joe had been thrown in with more fighters merely equivalent to that past peak ring worn version of Chris Eubank from '97 he would have had his chin checked and rechecked and finally cracked. Joe was good but not at all great. He was an overall fair sized super middleweight who had decent hand speed with only average to modest power whose offense technique is borderline ******ed as he chops like a spastic child. When in the ring with lesser athletes (poor comp) his better handspeed covers up his shortcomings and he rolled up the wins (but the majority of the post-Eubank fights were still struggles for Joe and he stopped nobody cleanly or without obvious controversy). When in the ring with better athletes they were always old and he looked deficient and/or amateurish in the aggregate.

    Joe was fortunate so many big names went through SMW to bigger and better fights or retired in the mid to late 90s. Joe is idolized on ESB due to the board's "demographic" majority. Any good athlete can see what Joe brought to the table and what he simply didn't have vis-a-vis the real talents that deserve their cred due to actual performances in which they faced other PRIME athletes in the ring not merely in the fantasies of a bunch of non-athletic internet posters who spend their lives posting ABOUT boxing or athletics.

    There are dozens upon dozens of less well considered fighters (on ESB) that fought MUCH better comp in their careers and I don't mean fighting 40 year old versions of great fighters. The obvious huge names would have crushed Joe as they would have been landing easily on Joe and not been taking punches like the weak sisters he has looked good against.


    At middleweight, Hop was past prime before Trinidad. A prime Hopkins was IMMEASURABLY too TOUGH and skilled for Joe. Nuthuggers want to delve into fantasy based upon Joe's horrible struggle with an ANCIENT BHOP and his win over RJJ (both in 2008!) yet don't imagine Joe showing up to call out BHOP (yes, out of his character as definitely no version of Joe - especially not a 26/28 year old - would have had the balls to contemplate facing an early 30s Hopkins) in the late 90s right after fighting Eubank. Add the eight pounds to the frame of that version of Hopkins at that time and there would be no mystery why Joe was struggling with guys like Robin Reid and certainly not dreaming of facing the real talent between 160-175 across the sea.

    Middleweight champ Gerald McClellan (about three years younger than BHOP) had already repeatedly faced real talent like RJJ and Liles in the amateurs in close, tight battles establishing his pedigree and would have ruled SMW with his size, ferocity, and talent if not for his injury (in a world supermiddleweight title fight directly from middleweight) which took down his career just as he moved into his late 20s. GMAN was at a higher level as a fighter. Frankie would have boxed circles around Joe and had the size to win EASILY. Prime RJJ should never be included in any conversation in which Joe's name or David Starie's or any lesser fighter is brought up - he would have worked (embarrassed) Joe and still got to the gym for two hours of ball later the same night.

    Your contention is perfectly correct, LordSharpshire.:thumbsup
     
  10. Back Hand Slap

    Back Hand Slap Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    Jul 18, 2009
  11. wentz

    wentz Member Full Member

    472
    0
    May 18, 2009
    Because Lacy was built up by boxing writers who were more or less working as publicists.

    Also, some people think every muscular black guy is a great athlete.
     
  12. JonesHagler

    JonesHagler Active Member Full Member

    766
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    :pc
     
  13. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    Co-Sign :deal
     
  14. JonesHagler

    JonesHagler Active Member Full Member

    766
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    Obviously Calzaghe is an all time great.....but he's not in the top 100 ATG....probably top 160-140 range....Hopkins top 40 Jones top 30
     
  15. Former Dawg

    Former Dawg Active Member Full Member

    631
    0
    Jul 11, 2009
    Calzaghe was a solid fighter with good skills but he chose opponents like he was afraid to lose. He never fought anyone where he felt it was an even match up. He always had to have some kind of advantage be it fighting in Wales or choosing opponents he knew were past their prime. He got out while the getting was good he knew he was eventually going to have to test himself. He retired instead of doing that.