Jeffries Retired Because He Was Terrified Of Being Defeated

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Dec 9, 2011.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,672
    30,571
    Jun 2, 2006
    The link below has interviews with Tom O Rourke,William Brady, and quotes from Billy Delaney.

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...3081,1270450&dq=johnson+jeannette+fight&hl=en


    Brady ,Jeffries manager ,states that Jeffries retired because he was mortally afraid of being beaten.
    "Jeffries always worried about his fights,and he was mortally afraid of being beaten." He told me many times he wanted to retire before defeat might come his way." "If he fights Johnson, Jeffries will worry a whole lot."


    O Rourke ,long time manager ,and promoter ,asserts that Delaney told him that Jeffries lacked real grit and wanted to quit in the 5th round of the Fitz fight, and in the 18th round of the Sharkey fight.

    Delaney, Jeffries trainer,stated that if "Jeffries ever met a man his own size, and weight, who could fight better than average , he would be defeated". Delaney went on to say that he tried to persuade Jeffries to fulfill his contract to fight Steve O Donnell after his bout with Bob Armstrong,Jeffries refused saying he had hurt his thumb.


    O Rourke says Jeffries refused to fight O Donnell because he had "lost his nerve".

    O Rourke goes on to say. " Jeffries licked Fitzsimmons because the latter was 50 lbs lighter, and was overconfident for him".
    " Corbett wasn't strong enough for him ,and Sharkey was 40lbs lighter".

    O Rourke managed George Dixon,Joe Walcott,George Gardner,and Tom Sharkey, among others.

    O Rourke continues---
    " Johnson was the first man of his size the latter ever met and, as soon as soon as Jeffries found he was up against it he lost confidence in himself"."
    " As a matter of fact, Jeffries never saw the day he could beat this black man".




    These quotes are a follow up to Jeffries defeat by Johnson ,which is stated happened because Jeffries suffered a nervous collapse.

    Delaney's criticisms must be treated with a degree of caution because by the time of the Reno fight, he and Jefffries were estranged .

    Brady ,and O Rourke's comments are not so easily dismissed however.


    Thoughts from the Forum?
     
  2. gentleman jim

    gentleman jim gentleman jim Full Member

    1,640
    57
    Jan 15, 2010
    Mmmm...Interesting to say the least. I'm a big fan of Jeffries but this post illustrates a problem I have when rating a lot of the old time greats at HW and that is that for a man like Jeffries we have the "Big fish in a small pond" syndrome. There just weren't alot of quality big men around at the time. There were big mne who fought but how good were they actually? Fitszimmons ko'd Ed Dunkhorst but how good was he really? As the years went by we began to see more quality big men emerge not only in Boxing but in all sports for that matter. It wasn't until the 1960's that good and big and fast began to really come to the fore in sports. Ali, Jim Brown, Wilt Chambelain, Bill Russell etc.. and we never looked back after that. Back to Jeffries..The man was good and tough and strong but let's face it...most of his opponents were considerably smaller than him. What highly skilled big man did he ever meet? Does that mean we should dismiss Jeffries as a champion? Of course not! But I think we have to examine the field of competition with a more objective eye before rating many of the past time greats against future opposition. I'm speaking about heavyweights here. Middleweights were the same size 100 years ago...but heavyweights certainly weren't! I'm sure I'll make some enemies here but I think I've raised some valid points.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,122
    53,487
    Feb 11, 2005
    I heard he was sleepless for weeks at the purported news of McMustache's comeback.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,672
    30,571
    Jun 2, 2006
    He was certainly sleepless on the night of July 3rd 1910 , his wife went to the door of his room several times because she heard him pacing up and down,asking him if he was ok?

    He curtly told her to," go away" .:lol:
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Jack Johnson KO 15 James Jeffries
     
  6. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    63
    Jul 15, 2007
    It's something that's effected my ranking him in the past to be honest - maybe a little unfair because I suppose everyone feels nerves and fear and what have you but it sometimes surprises you when it's someone as big and strong and rugged as big jeff who shows signs of mental weakness - I had read a few sources over the years which suggested that jeffries was something of a 'gentle ben' a massive guy with scary physical attributes and strength but maybe 'too nice'?? Maybe not enough of the 'killer' in him - I suppose for those that loved him this was what made him endearing but in the ring it may have limited him just that little bit- maybe? Maybe stopped him finishing people off who otherwise might have been based on the extent of the physical advantages he probably had over them - no doubt he did look really against Jack Johnson like he'd rather have been somewhere else than suffering in front of thousands who adored him
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,122
    53,487
    Feb 11, 2005
    Because a day before he thought the fix was in for him to win.

    Lil Arthur informed him to the contrary.
     
  8. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,305
    1,868
    Sep 13, 2006
    This is all bosh and revisionist history. Nothing Jeff ever did in the ring suggested he was yellow. In fact, I think he underestimated Johnson, as many did, and still do. Coming back after 6 years to fight a guy in his prime in your first fight back? Geez, you are either sorely underestimating a guy or just in it for the payday.

    You have to study the era to fully understand the color line in American life. Even Tommy Burns, who was a Canadian, had to go to Australia to break the color line in the heavyweight division in 1908, and it wasn't broken again in the heavyweight division by a white champion until 1937.

    Breaking the color line back then would be somewhat analogous to the gay marriage debate that has been going on for the past several decades. It was a very big deal to a lot of powerful folks who simply did not want it to happen. When it came to a white heavyweight champion defending against a black contender, there were a lot of social and political pressures for it not to happen, particularly in a sport like boxing which was constantly under legal fire as it was.
     
    Letseatshitfordinner likes this.
  9. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,241
    5,919
    Apr 30, 2006
    There's probably some soundness to the claims. Overall, The proof is in the pudding- he came out of retirement to gamble his zero against Johnson in a fight he knew carried a tremendous amount of risk for himself and much weight socially if he lost. Let alone if he got whipped in it, which he did. Fighters who are truly insecure about their 0 don't come back after a multi-year retirement.

    That said, it's not at all uncommon for very good/great fighters to use a fear of losing as a motivating factor for training. And it can be a powerful one- the overall success of Jeffries and, as a contemporary example, Mayweather, can't be denied. I think it's important to separate how we rank what they actually did in their careers from what we perceive their attitudes about it outside the ring though. I don't think Jeffries was scared of anyone and it's offensive to portray him as a coward, but the concept of possibly losing may have driven him that much harder.

    Fear of losing isn't necessarily a bad thing in boxing unless it cripples you. Used properly, alot of good can come from it.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    Whatever mendoza says, I will agree with.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,995
    28,006
    Feb 15, 2006
    I have to fundamentaly disagree with the premise of this thread.

    Jeffries was clearly perceived to be almost unbeatable when he retired. A large part of the problem was that the media didn't think that anybody was a credible opponent for him, including Johnson.

    Even if he had looked at Johnson and seen something that others had missed, Johnsons loss to Marvin Hart would have given him a cast iron excuse to fight sombody else. Alternativley he could have just continued drawing the colour line.

    Jeffries did not care what the media thought of him.

    He did not particularly like boxing or boxing fans.

    He saw the title as a means to enrich himself.

    He probably didn't particularly care where he ended up in the pantheon of the heavyweight champions.
     
    Letseatshitfordinner likes this.
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,672
    30,571
    Jun 2, 2006
    What credence you put on the quotes is entirely up to you, but it is NOT revisionist history it is the contemporary opinion of the men who knew Jeffries better than anyone. Namely his manager , his trainer, and a man who saw him fight from ringside in many of his big battles as he was managing the man in the opposite corner [Sharkey,] for two of them . No doubt Jeffries had pressure on him ,how about the pressure that was on Johnson?

    How about the fact that he was shot at the night before?

    How about the pressure he was under when he fought Burns .

    Did Jeffries ever have a whole crowd against him ,screaming insults at him?

    Jeffries fought 16 of his 23 fights in his home state.

    Johnson fought all around the world and against young men when well past his prime . Jeffries made his name off of fighting retired ex champs.

    You can say Delaney had an ulterior motive for his comments but what about the other two ?
    No one is suggesting that Jeffries was physical coward ,but he was known to lack confidence throughout his career.

    In the link below, Corbett attributes Jeffries defeat to the change of site from Jeffries native Californina to Reno Nevada, Delaney being in Johnson's corner, and Jeffries lacking confidence.

    Are these opinions revisionist tosh too?

    http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F10D17F83C5E12738DDDAB0994DF405B808DF1D3
     
  13. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    129
    Aug 13, 2009
    Isn't that why everyone retires?

    Its either..

    "****, I keep going I'm going to start losing."

    or

    "****, I'm losing alot. I should probably re-thinkg this boxing thing."


    Unless your a manly man like Holyfield...

    "I should have wore a condom when I ****ed that *****..sweet Jesus."
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,995
    28,006
    Feb 15, 2006
    Part of the problem with these quotes is that they are all from people who ended up on bad terms with Jeffries, and some time after the event.

    With regard to the Armstrong bout, it is prety reliably documented that Jeffries injured his thumb. He also offered to go through with the subsequent fight despite the injury.

    Regarless of the veracity of these statments or otherwise, it is highly unlikley that fear of loosing played any role in Jeffries decision to retire.
     
    Letseatshitfordinner likes this.