Jerry Quarry vs Jimmy Young

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by abraq, May 18, 2008.


  1. Grebfan9

    Grebfan9 Member Full Member

    448
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    I am leaning towards a prime Jimmy Young over a prime Jerry
    Quarry.

    Quarry always seemed to have problems with the sleek quick
    fighters like Eddie Machen, Jimmy Ellis, Muhammad Ali.

    Quarry did well against ponderous sluggers like Ron Lyle, Earnie
    Shavers, Mac Foster.

    I think that Young sticks with his jab, flurries on the inside, ties
    up Quarry when necessary and wins the decision.


    Grebfan9
    www.firstroundboxing.com
     
  2. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    30
    Jan 29, 2008
    All of those losses, however, happened before and after Jimmy was in his prime. During his prime -- 1975 to 1977 -- Young's only losses were questionable decisions to Ali and Norton.
     
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Yeah, Young was an absolute juggernaut in peak form for a few years there.
     
  4. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    843
    Jul 22, 2004
    I remember a veteran promoter (name escapes me) saying "Quarry wouldn't want any part of this guy" after watching Young dismantle Lyle. Unless Quarry could land flush early in a round (and maybe not even then) Young has his way with his boxing skills, counterpunching, and side to side almost quasi-Walcott-ish technique (another guy all wrong for Jerry IMO)
    Also consider that, when two accomplished counter-punchers engage each other, often the fight can lapse into "snooze-ville"...
    my $0.02