Jersey Joe Walcott and Ezzard Charles, who was the better heavyweight at their peaks?

Journeyman92 · Sep 12, 2024

HistoryZero26 said: ↑

This was the smallest era of HW in 40 years.

Charles got beaten badly by Bivins and Lloyd Marshall at LHW and at HW was dominant champ who won 11 15 rounders in a row. This does not include his 4 wins over Bivins. Going into the Valdes fight in 1953 he was like 39-4 at HW with 3 of the losses being very close decisions and no unavenged losses. After that he was sub .500. He was 32 at the time but he'd already compiled a great resume. At LHW his resumes mainly the 3 Moore wins and the 2 Marshall wins.
Click to expand...

I don’t understand what are you trying to tell me? Sorry I’m not a sharper sort of knife.

HistoryZero26 · Sep 12, 2024

Journeyman92 said: ↑

I don’t understand what are you trying to tell me? Sorry I’m not a sharper sort of knife.
Click to expand...

Charles was a great HW.

Log in or Sign up

Jersey Joe Walcott and Ezzard Charles, who was the better heavyweight at their peaks?

Who was better at their peaks?

Walcott

Charles

Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Jersey Joe Walcott and Ezzard Charles, who was the better heavyweight at their peaks?

Who was better at their peaks?

Walcott

Charles

Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member