Jersey Joe Walcott in H2H matches.. How does he do?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Jun 27, 2010.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005

    I like Walcott over Norton and Foreman

    Frazier matches up well against Walcott and tracks him down

    Walcott gives Ali nightmares, this is a close one. I favor Ali, but this would be one of his toughest fights. Walcott's footwork was actually just as good as a 1960s Ali. This woud be spectacular to watch. Walcott doing the walcott waltz and Ali doing the Ali shuffle.

    Walcott upsets liston in a close one. Liston's nightmare style is speed/movement/angles/trickiness. Walcott was that plus power. Walcott could also slip a jab with the best of em, and dish out triple jab combinations.

    Walcott of 1947 might even beat Marciano. It's possible his faster feet allow him to stay away and not get caught by the big right hand the last few rounds.

    Yes, Walcott was that good. He was an ATG talent of the highest calibre. One of the very best of all time. Eddie Futch even said so.
     
  2. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    I can see Wally being up on points early to midway through a 10, 12 or 15 rounder with both "Norton and Foreman," but I think size and strength prevails here........ Joe Wally never kicked ass on a monster who was easily 215 to 220 pounds with wicked right hand power before...... I think Norton and Foreman track down the 195 pound Wallcott and off him......

    MR.BILL
     
  3. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    100
    Dec 26, 2009
    Ever heard of Hoff?
    A big tall 6'5 strong heavyweight with a wicked left jab and an 84 inch reach... Walcott did very well against him and Hoff is pretty much as big as Norton or Foreman.
    Plus Norton couldn't take a punch well. I bet Walcott's left hook would kill him. Or his right cross.
    As For Foreman, Hoff would stay away and counter Foreman all day, and use his footwork and speed to eliminate Foreman. Or he could stand toe to toe.
    He ranks very well among the great heavyweights.. I think he might deserve a spot in my top 10.
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Ummm...Yes he did. Joe Louis. 6'2 213lb.



    You want to question Louis' power in 1946?

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUzJaokX_N8[/ame]



    What do you mean by norton "tracks" walcott down? Who did Norton ever knockout that was world class? a washed up unrated jerry quarry does not count. Norton was not a big puncher. Norton could hit fairly hard with the right hand, but nothing mind boggling. I believe Walcott hit harder than Norton. Walcott's power certainly has a more noticeable effect on film, than Norton's.
     
  5. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    great work suzie:thumbsup
     
  6. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    i think ezzard charles, jimmy bivins and elmer ray are all worth mentioning
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005

    Wrong. Hoff was closer to 6'5. I don't know why boxrec changed it. There are reports at Hoff's height ranging from 6'3 to 6'6. Judging from the films, he looks closer to 6'6 personally.


    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...98,3040542&dq=hein+ten+hoff+6+foot+five&hl=en
    Here is one source which lists him as 6'6


    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...pg=5664,5670271&dq=hein+ten+hoff+6+foot&hl=en

    Here is another source. says Hoff is 6'4 1/2" and towers 6" over Walcott.


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTmNZZXLMng[/ame]
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Yep. Don't forget Lee Q Murray, Harold Johnson.
     
  9. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    well, as brilliant as johnson was at light heavy he wasn't really a natural heavy. tommy gomez is another great win (don't know much at all bout murray i'm afraid)
     
  10. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    100
    Dec 26, 2009
    Well, I read in a different boxing forum that he was 6'5. whatever. the point is he was a big heavyweight with a good jab and an 84 inch reach.
    The point is he he could take on a big heavyweight.
    Too bad I'm not a child, Norton... Honestly, Walcott has the power to Stop Norton. He had a wicked left hook and right cross. Besides that, I think he would outbox Norton based on speed and skill if he doesn't stop him.
    As for Foreman... If Jimmy Young can outbox n unmotivated Foreman, then Walcott can do it too, who has good speed and defensive skill. If Foreman ever had him in trouble he would just use his defensive skill to get out of it. You just think anyone below 200 LB is a bad fighter. I guess you forgot that your hero, Norton, was below 200 LB at a point of his career.
    Man, you really are a troll.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Tommy read my prior post. He was 6'5
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005


    Cleveland Promoter Believes
    Murray Can Take Joe Louis
    BY JACK CUDDY

    NEW YORK, Dec. 7—(UP)—


    Larry Atkins of Cleveland, America's second ranking prizefight promoter, believes that
    Lee. Q. Murray, big Connecticut negro, is the most dangerous potential threat to Sgt. Joe Louis' heavyweight crown.
    This content is protected
    This Atkins' praise of Murray was so entirely unexpected that a startled reporter inquired of the visiting Cleveland entrepreneur last night, "how come you boost, Murray, when he almost'ruined Jimmy Bivins, your meal, ticket, last week?" Atkins, a youngish, broadshouldered, black-haired chap of 41, fixed the reporter with steely eyes, and remonstrated,'In our Cleveland promotions,we have no meal tickets. We have cards. A Cleveland fighter is a card as long as he can lick anybody we bring in. When he loses to an outsider, the outsider becomes the card."In the case of Murray vs. "Card" Bivins of Cleveland, promoter Atkins was doubly fortunate. Little Bivins won an unpopular 10-round decision over Murray last Wednesday night, after Murray had the Cleveland negro staggering about the ring and dripping with gore. The fans booed the-decision so long, and so lustily that a re-match was as necessary as if by royal command. They'll tangle, again in late February — after both principals recover from their wounds. Atkins, who in four short years changed Cleveland from one of the country's worst fight cities into a promoter's paradise, said, "I knew Murray was a good fighter before I matched him'with Bivins. But during the first two rounds, I thought Murray would ruin me. He never let loose with a punch. Disgustedly, I left my seat at the ringside, and walked to the rear of the arena. But Murray was just mouse-trapping his man. He knew Bivins was a cutie and he was sucking him in. Bivins left himself open in the third round, and Murray hit him. Bivins rolled with that right-hand punch to the chin; but the force was so terrific that Bivins wasn't the same for the rest of the fight. I don't know whether little Bivins, who '.weighs' only about 187 ..pounds, or Murray, who has 200 on six foot three frame, is 'the better fighter. But Murray is the most dangerous. He's the most terrific puncher I ever saw; he hits as hard as. Louis. He's still a little awkward being, a converted Southpaw. But being a Converted Southpaw ' makes him a switch hitter, who can, knock you dead with eitherhand. And he's only 23." Atkins, in New York on a business trip, said it seemed a dream that he — an under study to Mike Jacobs — 'should have the two best civilian heavyweights in the world tied up on contracts He hoped he still had a contract on Murraywhen Sergeant Louis got out of the Army. ."



    Ray Arcel called Murray "The best puncher of the era, besides Joe Louis"



    Murray can be placed right along Jimmy Bivins and Elmer Ray. As you can read above, Murray was a dangerous boxer-puncher. He had good size too 6'3 210lb. Murray was rated top 5 in the world when Walcott beat him.
     
  13. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    thanks for the info suzie:good puts murray into context
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Jordoz...in case you didn't see the 2nd part I edited in



    I don't know whether little Bivins, who '.weighs' only about 187 ..pounds, or Murray, who has 200 on six foot three frame, is 'the better fighter. But Murray is the most dangerous. He's the most terrific puncher I ever saw; he hits as hard as. Louis. He's still a little awkward being, a converted Southpaw. But being a Converted Southpaw ' makes him a switch hitter, who can, knock you dead with eitherhand. And he's only 23." Atkins, in New York on a business trip, said it seemed a dream that he — an under study to Mike Jacobs — 'should have the two best civilian heavyweights in the world tied up on contracts He hoped he still had a contract on Murraywhen Sergeant Louis got out of the Army."
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    I don't know of "Hoff" so I gotta look his ass up......

    Wally did beat Louie over 15 rds in '47, but was butt-reamed by politics and the love for Joe Louis........ BUT! Louis did roar back in '48 to KO Joe Wally's ass in round 11......

    Though Louis was not able to maintain his prime weights of 197 to 202 pounds as he aged.... That 211 to 218 that Louis carried in the late 40s and into the early 50s was bulk material on Louis' body......

    I feel Walcott maintained his fighting weight much better as he aged......

    MR.BILL